Is a Ventless Fireplace More Efficient Than a Condensing Furnace?

building-scienceheader image

Is a Ventless Fireplace More Efficient Than a Condensing Furnace?

An energy conversion conundrum for building science geeks

Posted on Mar 14 2018 by Allison A. Bailes III, PhD

One of the primary benefits of a ventless gas fireplace is that you don't lose any heat up the flue. That's because there isn't a flue, of course. (The potential problems with indoor air quality, however, outweigh any benefits, so don't run out and buy one just yet. Or ever.) That ought to make it a winner for heating efficiency in comparison to any vented heating appliance, such as furnace or boiler. Even the highest efficiency condensing furnaces still lose some heat in the exhaust gases that go up the flue.

So does that mean ventless fireplaces are more efficient than condensing furnaces?

Heating efficiency numbers

Let's take a look at the efficiency values for these two heating appliances. Before we get to them, though, let's talk about the standard furnace: the 80 AFUEAnnual Fuel Utilization Efficiency. Widely-used measure of the fuel efficiency of a heating system that accounts for start-up, cool-down, and other operating losses that occur during real-life operation. AFUE is always lower than combustion efficiency. Furnaces sold in the United States must have a minimum AFUE of 78%. High ratings indicate more efficient equipment. induced draft furnace. AFUE stands for annual fuel utilization efficiency(AFUE) Widely-used measure of the fuel efficiency of a heating system that accounts for start-up, cool-down, and other operating losses that occur during real-life operation. AFUE is always lower than combustion efficiency. Furnaces sold in the United States must have a minimum AFUE of 78%. High ratings indicate more efficient equipment. , and it is the percent efficiency averaged over a year. We see a lot of that type of furnace here in the Southeast. When the gas gets burned in one of these furnaces, 80% of the energy in the gas gets transferred to the air moving through the furnace, which then goes into the conditioned spaceInsulated, air-sealed part of a building that is actively heated and/or cooled for occupant comfort. , while 20% of the heat goes up the flue.

A high-efficiency condensing furnace does much better. They start at about 92%, although most condensing furnaces are in the 95%+ range. We did a quick search on the AHRI Directory this morning and found the highest efficiency model at 97.7%.

When you look for the efficiency of unvented gas log fireplaces, you see claims for 99% to 99.9%. (For purposes of this article, let's just say it's 99.9%.) That number is so high because, as I said at the beginning, none of the heat is escaping up the flue.

Percentage of what?

Based on those numbers, it looks like the unvented gas fireplace (also euphemistically calles ventless or vent-free) is the winner. Not many people would dispute that 99 is a bigger number than 97.7. But there's a hidden problem here. We're trying to compare apples to oranges when we compare 99% to 97.7%.

Here's why. Both the unvented gas fireplace and the condensing furnace have a combustion efficiency of nearly 100%. That means pretty much every one of the methane molecules combines with two molecules of oxygen, producing one molecule of carbon dioxide and two molecules of water vapor and some heat.

The unvented gas fireplace keeps all of that heat in the house, which is how they claim 99.9% efficiency. The only loss is from the little bit of incomplete combustion that happens. But there's something missing here.

In that combustion reaction, there are three products: carbon dioxide, water vapor, and heat. What's lacking in the efficiency rating for the unvented gas appliance is the latent heat of the water vapor. And that's where the name of the condensing furnace comes in. That water vapor has a lot of energy in it. When it condenses, it gives up heat. In a condensing furnace, there's a secondary heat exchangerDevice that transfers heat from one material or medium to another. An air-to-air heat exchanger, or heat-recovery ventilator, transfers heat from one airstream to another. A copper-pipe heat exchanger in a solar water-heater tank transfers heat from the heat-transfer fluid circulating through a solar collector to the potable water in the storage tank. whose purpose is to condense that water vapor and capture that heat.

So, let's introduce a couple of new terms here. When we talk about natural gas as a heating fuel, it has two different heating values. The Lower Heating Value is the amount of heat you get from the combustion and from bringing all the combustion products back to the original temperature without condensing the water vapor. That's what's being used in the 99.9% efficiency rating for unvented gas fireplaces.

The Higher Heating Value is the the heat given off during combustion and bringing the combustion products back to the original temperature plus the heat that comes from condensing the water vapor. And that's what the efficiency of condensing (and standard 80 AFUE) furnaces is based on. (The Wikipedia page on heat of combustion has a good explanation of lower and higher heating value.)

How much does of a difference does this make? If the unvented gas fireplace manufacturers reported efficiency relative to the Higher Heating Value, they would come in at about 91%. So a condensing furnace at 95-98% efficiency would get you get 4-7% more heat from the same amount of fuel than an unvented gas fireplace.

Don't skip the comments

I'm a very lucky blogger. I find interesting things to write about in the world of building science and have attracted some very smart readers. Some of them post comments that add a lot to the discussion at hand or raise new topics to discuss. That's the case here.

When I wrote about the first law of thermodynamics in November 2017, Roy C posed a little quiz for us in the comment section. I thought I knew the answer, but turned out to be wrong. I, like many others, had assumed that a 99.9% efficient unvented gas fireplace would be more efficient than a 95% condensing furnace. But Roy C is a smart guy with a heck of a lot of engineering experience and knowledge.

So, when you read articles here, don't skip the comments. Not only could you learn something new, but you might also get a preview of a future article.

Allison Bailes of Decatur, Georgia, is a speaker, writer, building science consultant, and the author of the Energy Vanguard Blog. You can follow him on Twitter at @EnergyVanguard.

Tags: , , ,

Image Credits:

  1. Image #1: Virginia State Parks via
  2. Image #2: Energy Vanguard

Mar 14, 2018 3:36 PM ET

Factoring in humidifiers
by Reid Baldwin

The analysis might come out differently if you assume that the house needs supplemental humidification. In such houses, the water vapor added by a ventless fireplace is a benefit. What is the efficiency of a condensing furnace attached to a humidifier when you discount the heat that is used to vaporize water rather than heat the space?

All things considered, I would not advocate for releasing combustion products into the house as a good way to increase humidity. However, it is an efficient way to accomplish that when you only consider fuel use.

Mar 14, 2018 5:19 PM ET

by stephen sheehy

Don't these ventless contraptions add enough CO2 to the interior air that the occupants lose the mental ability to assess the energy issues discussed in this article?
Seriously, why even discuss this?

Mar 14, 2018 5:49 PM ET

Academic only, I hope
by Charlie Sullivan

Stephen, I trust this is only a discussion for the purpose of sharpening our understanding, not promoting actually installing those.

But for Allison, I have this comment: If the water vapor it produces condenses on your windows, does it count as a condensing appliance? If the envelope is sufficiently tight that it all the water vapor condenses on the windows rather than leaking out, maybe we could get up to 99% HHV efficiency. Then the only question is whether the residents can mop up the puddles on the floor under the windows before they are overcome by the combustion gasses.

Mar 15, 2018 6:34 AM ET

A new TV game show
by Martin Holladay

We could create a TV game show for GBA readers. Two teams would compete for fuel efficiency in side-by-side homes. Team A would sit in their chairs, reading Fine Homebuilding magazine, kept comfortably warm by a condensing furnace.

Team B would be in the house with the ventless gas appliance. They would run back and forth from window to window, wielding towels -- rushing to the kitchen sink to wring them out. Look! One of the team members is staggering due to the fumes! He's down!

Looks like Team A wins again this week. Tune in next week for another exciting episode.

Register for a free account and join the conversation

Get a free account and join the conversation!
Become a GBA PRO!