Passive Annual Heat Storage & Zero-Energy-HVAC
My question is: Why do we not see more building recommendations along this line of thinking? Various experimental aspects of this structural approach (to managing HVAC with zero-energy input) have been proven effective, in recent decades. Some ancient architecture also demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach. Present day oversight might primarily be induced by subconscious avoidance of anything which seems to relate to cavemen. (Some cavemen may have somewhat understood annualized heat). Yet today we have so many aspects which should delight an architect while incorporating elements of like design. While incorporating such features in houses which appear ordinary might increase costs of a project, could one not suppose that "free energy" is incentive enough, to try some features-- I have studied various approaches to this -- My extended blogs with many web links--
http://www.midcoast.com/~bo/CostFreeHVAC/RealyInsulatedLot/SelfSufficien...
Bo Atkinson
Yahoo
Technorati
Google
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit






my opinion: because it's not good for the economy. A whole lot of people would be out of a job and out of business if this were common knowledge. Heating and Air Conditioning would become obsolete and a whole lot less power would be necessary. Less solar panels would be sold. etc.. Currently the green movement is still a commercial thing (operating in a "capitialist" world where waste is an important part of the economy). These types of buildings are more harmonious with the planet and a lot less commercial with a whole lot less waste!
Enlightened cavemen notwithstanding, there are multiple legitimate reasons to question or avoid underground living - even with the potential for zero energy living.
I can achieve nearly the same result with an above-ground super-insulated, super-tight building with no windows - it can be heated by human and utility heat in winter and passively ventilated with a solar chimney in summer. But no one wants to live in a windowless box, and few choose to live in a light-deprived and view-restricted cave.
Additionally, PAHS requires enormous volumes of concrete (very high embodied energy and environmental life-cycle costs, including massive global warming contribution), large volumes of petrochemical foam insulation and synthetic waterproofing membranes, and must be perfectly engineered since altering the heat storage system is cost-prohibitive.
For those interested in the advantages of the PAHS approach with few of the drawbacks, Annualized Geo-Solar allows similar storage with above-ground houses built with natural materials.
http://www.greenershelter.org/index.php?pg=2
Agreed! Getting options is the point. Each according to a budget within reach or at least try for the piecemeal approach. Had to find a cheaper web host, moved the pages here--
http://harmoniouspalette.com/CostFreeHVAC/RealyInsulatedLot/SelfSufficie...
Depends on region or it can also depend on how many years of a life a person commits to sweat equity in general.
These options for living above ground-
http://harmoniouspalette.com/CostFreeHVAC/WholeLotInsulation.html
http://harmoniouspalette.com/PAHS-retrofit.html
http://harmoniouspalette.com/45degTiltUp.html
Composite insulation design-
http://harmoniouspalette.com/BuildGreen.html
http://harmoniouspalette.com/PAHSgreenhouse.html#chimney
Idealizing hobbit holes - Basic underground ideas-
http://harmoniouspalette.com/u-tube.html
Donut vault geometry for extra structural efficiency-
http://harmoniouspalette.com/SqDonutVaults.html
Tried the solar attic style first, flower beds prevented retrofit-
http://harmoniouspalette.com/TranslucentDome.html
Ferrocement and concrete can work in unexpected ways, given ample-know-how. Looking ahead of that curve of life would help, but i slipped a little, off the self-sufficient-ish edge. Back on now, as jobs might be harder and harder to find.
Post new answer