GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Is the aging of urethane foams considered off-gassing?

user-1091831 | Posted in Green Products and Materials on

So I’m a bit confused here. My understanding of urethane foams (e.g. closed cell spray foam or polyiso) is that the blowing agent gases trapped within the closed cell structure slowly leak out over time and is replaced with air, depreciating the R-value. But then I see that certain companies advertise that their polyurethane spray foam products/kits do not off-gas. Is the leakage of the blowing agent not off-gassing, or is the manufacturer making a false claim? I’m assuming that they use an HFC blowing agent. Maybe I’m just missing something.

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #1

    Mike,
    There are at least three issues here:

    1. Is there a legal definition of offgassing?

    2. How much pentane (the blowing agent used for polyiso) is released per day per square foot of polyiso?

    3. Are the blowing agents in the insulations you are worried about -- pentane in the case of polyiso -- dangerous to humans in the concentrations at which they are likely to be encountered?

    I don't know if there is a legal definition of offgassing. Almost everything offgasses, including a fresh loaf of bread, an apple pie, and a new pair of sneakers.

  2. Expert Member
    Dana Dorsett | | #2

    Foam insulations offgas things other than the blowing agents, and at different rates. Polystyrene (EPS and XPS) has significant amounts of styrene offgassing early in life.

    Polyurethane and polyisocyanate both release polyols and isocyanates during blowing, but the rates diminish rapidly over time as the product cures, provided they dialed in the temps & chemical mix correctly. But the amount & rate of release are affected heavily by the mix and chemical temperature(s) during installation. An improper mix can lead to very long term outgassing. The HFC blowing agents used for closed cell polyurethane are released at a much slower rate (give it a half-century or more) than the pentane used for polyiso (weeks, months/years/decades, depending on the thickness & density of the foam, and the type of facers used.) The initial R-values of pentane blown polyiso are well above the labeled values, but most will hit the labeled value in well under a decade, which means most of the pentane has already found it's way out. With EPS it pretty much hits it's labeled value in mere months, if that.

    Pentane has a sugary sort of smell that you can sometimes detect when cutting freshly blown iso or EPS, but it's pretty faint (if you can smell it at all) when cutting foam that's even a year old. I've read (but not seen formal data) that the half-life of pentane in EPS sheet goods is measured in days, but with foil facers it goes up dramatically. I assume that's also true for polyiso, which has a less-well defined closed cell structure than mid or high density EPS.

    There's reason to be skeptical of polyurethane kit vendors's claims about outgassing since the foam kits and throwaway kit blowing guns do not have the temperature & mixture controls of professional foam blowing equipment. Somewhere there is probably some fine print about the exact temperatures and mixtures where the outgassing rates fall below some industry or safety agency max level, but there's no guarantee a kit user would always (or ever?) be able to meet those specs.

    (Almost) full disclosure: About fifteen years ago I designed the control & power electronics for temperature controls on a professional polyurethane blowing system. (I was operating as a contractor and I'm not at liberty to divulge the name of the client, due to contractual non-disclosure clauses. As part of the prototype testing I got to see some pretty sticky messes when the temps were intentionally set way off for test purposes, and many months later the samples still smelled. It's possible to really screw it up if you try hard enough, and I'm betting the lingering stink wasn't the blowing agent, but a primary chemical.

  3. user-1091831 | | #3

    Hi Martin,

    You make good points there. With that in mind, I would venture to guess that the company advertises as "no offgassing" from the perspective of item number 3. If the rate of offgassing hasn't been proven to be concentrated enough to pose any noticeable health effects, and if people's main concern with offgassing is health, then why not advertise it as free from offgassing so they can add another bullet point advantage to the product?

  4. user-1091831 | | #4

    Dana,

    Thanks for that detailed insight, much appreciated!

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |