GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Building Science

A Beautiful Near-Net-Zero-Energy Home in Utah

Built with structural insulated panels and Passive House level of airtightness, this home is a winner

The O'Meara House in Utah is almost performing as a net-zero energy home. It has R-48 walls, R-12 windows, a R-72 roof, and two 5,000-gallon tanks to store solar thermal energy.
Image Credit: Images #1, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, and #10: Energy Vanguard
View Gallery 10 images
The O'Meara House in Utah is almost performing as a net-zero energy home. It has R-48 walls, R-12 windows, a R-72 roof, and two 5,000-gallon tanks to store solar thermal energy.
Image Credit: Images #1, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, and #10: Energy Vanguard
The building enclosure details start at ground level with the insulated foundation footing forms.
Image Credit: Images #2, #3 and #6: Kevin and Svetlana O'Meara
Structural insulated panel (SIP) framing helps ensure an airtight building enclosure. The opaque doors are insulated to R-20 with 4 inches of extruded polystyrene (XPS) foam insulation. Through the 12-inch-thick SIP walls, you can see some of the solar thermal collectors. Insulated water storage tanks for the solar thermal system provide domestic hot water and space heating for the O'Meara home. The solar thermal tank and pluming for the hydronic heating system in the mechanical room. The heat recovery ventilator (HRV) provides mechanical ventilation for the home. A beautiful home with a view of three ski resorts. The O'Meara home entrance is a welcoming sight. The sidewalk leading up to it is made of pervious concrete.

It’s the day after St. Patrick’s Day, so let me tell you a wee bit about the O’Mearas. Kevin and Svetlana O’Meara live in a beautiful home in Utah that’s oh-so-close to being a net-zero-energy home. After I wrote about how home building is like skiing two years ago, Kevin invited me out to see their home and this year I managed to to do so. My wife and I visited them for two days last week and Kevin told me all about the house, including his one major regret.

I took the photo above at sunrise a few days ago, so you can see how the design is optimized for capturing sunlight and solar heat. Park City, Utah is a cold climate, and the O’Meara home sits across the valley from three ski resorts (Deer Valley, Park City, and The Canyons). It’s at an elevation of 7,000 feet, has a winter design temperature of 0°F, and gets about 9,000 heating degree days through the year.

And when I say “through the year,” I mean it. Last year they had snow in the middle of June.

Let’s take a look at what the O’Mearas did to make this house a winner.

Building enclosure

If you’re going for net-zero energy performance, you could just add enough photovoltaic (PV) modules to cover whatever your energy use is. Lloyd Alter skeptically wrote: “In Net Zero, you want to generate enough power on site to heat, cool and light your house; it could be a draughty barn, but if you put enough green gizmos on the roof to generate enough green energy to feed it, who cares?” (See his article, Why Insulation and Good Design Beat Green Gizmos, for more.)

But that’s not really the best way to do it. Ideally, you minimize the energy consumption of the house first and only then do you add the amount of PV you need to make it go. That’s the route Kevin and Svetlana took with their home.

Beginning at the ground level, the O’Meara house is like a Yeti cooler. The interior space is surrounded by a lot of continuous foam insulation. Here are the insulation details:

  • They put 8 inches of high-density expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam insulation beneath the slab for an R-value of 36.
  • The east, south, and west walls are built with structural insulated panels (SIPs) with 12 inches of EPS at R-48.
  • The north wall is concrete for thermal mass and has a phase-change material embedded in it to help moderate the indoor temperatures.
  • The roof is made with SIPs that have 12 inches of EPS plus another 4 inches of EPS on top for an R-value of 72.

They also used a blower door during the air sealing to make sure they achieved a Passive House level of airtightness. And yes, they did get the air leakage all the way down to 0.6 ach50. That’s quite an accomplishment.

Measured airtightness is only beginning to be required. Georgia was the first state to require that all new homes meet a threshold for air leakage, and that started in 2011. Builders in this state have to get their homes to less than 7 ach50. Any jurisdiction that adopts the 2015 IECC will have to impose stricter requirements: 3 ach50 for most of the country and 5 ach50 for the warmest areas (climate zones 1 and 2).

Did I mention that the O’Mearas hit 0.6 ach50? That’s tight!

When you look at photos of the house and see all that glazing, you may wonder about the windows, naturally. Even the best windows are thermal liabilities compared to the walls they’re installed in, so you can’t just insulate the heck out of the walls and ignore the windows.

The O’Mearas did their homework here and installed quadruple-paned windows with a U-factor of 0.08. That translates to an R-value of 12. Not so good for a wall, amazing for a window. (I’ll talk about solar heat gain coefficients below.)

Then there are the doors. As you can see in the photo below, the opaque doors are really thick. That’s because they’re custom made of of wood and extruded polystyrene (XPS) foam insulation. With 4 inches of XPS, the doors have R-20 insulation inside. Wow!

Solar energy

Another important property of the building enclosure is that it’s designed to capture heat. With 9,000 heating degree days, they need heat, so capturing it and keeping it inside is a high priority. The photo below shows how thick the walls are with those 12-inch-thick SIPs, and outside that quadruple-paned window you can see some of the solar thermal collectors on the roof.

The solar thermal collectors send heat into water stored in two 5,000-gallon tanks buried in the back yard. They’re insulated with 12 inches of EPS, for an R-value of 48. The hot water stored there is used for their domestic hot water supply and for space heating.

Remember, though, they’re also capturing the heat directly through the south-facing windows. To do so, they installed windows with a relatively high solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) on the south side. Some of them have have 0.6 and some have 0.64 SHGC. The other three sides of the house all have windows with a low SHGC.

To get close to net zero energy use, they also have a PV system that generates electricity. I didn’t get the specs on it, but since it was installed five years ago, it’s smaller and was more expensive than what they’d install now.

Mechanical systems

I’ve already mentioned that the house is in a cold climate, so it may not be too much of a surprise to you to find out they have no air conditioning. They can cool the house, though, and I’ll get to that in a bit. First, let’s talk about their heating.

The photo below shows the pipes, pumps, and indoor tank for their hydronic heating system. Everything is connected by a controller that monitors indoor, outdoor, and water temperatures and sends the right amount of water to the right places for heating.

In addition to pulling hot water from the insulated tanks, the hydronic system can also pull cool water from a third 5,000 gallon tank used for rainwater catchment. When they circulate that through the system, they can get some radiant cooling in the house. That works great in Utah because they don’t have to worry about the dew point of indoor air ever getting high enough to condense on radiant cooling surfaces. The humidity here in the Southeast makes radiant cooling a bit trickier.

Another part of the cooling system is the window controller, a device that can mechanically open and close windows in the home. Like the controls for the heating system, it senses indoor and outdoor temperatures.

And then there’s ventilation. An airtight home needs some kind of mechanical ventilation, and they use a heat recovery ventilator (HRV). It exhausts air from the house through one side and brings in outdoor air through the other. The two airstreams pass by each other and exchange heat, allowing the ventilation air to come in pre-warmed and the O’Mearas to keep most of their heat in the home.

The amount of ventilation they get is controlled by carbon dioxide levels in the home and by occupancy sensors. Whenever I walked into the bathroom, I’d hear the faint hum of the HRV as it came on when the infrared sensor detected my presence.

It’s a NASCAR house!

When I worked at Southface, we jokingly referred to any home that went for a bunch of certifications as a “NASCAR house.” The O’Meara house would qualify, as it picked up several certifications by the time it was done. They got:

“At first I was opposed to doing LEED because it seemed like greenwashing, but it turned out to have some real advantages,” Kevin told me. One benefit was getting discounts from some of their suppliers when they found out about what the O’Mearas were doing. Another advantage was in gathering the various stakeholders together for meetings to discuss how they could meet all the requirements. This allowed them to iron out identified trouble spots ahead of time.

Why they didn’t get Passive House certification

Although they got several certifications, Passive House was not among them. It wasn’t for lack of interest or knowledge, though. Kevin discovered the Passive House movement a couple of years before they built the house and even bought the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) software. He used the PHPP to do some early modeling of the house and fully intended to get the house certified as a Passive House through PHIUS.

The obstacles in the path, though, thwarted his efforts. He had difficulty getting all the data he needed for the PHPP model. He said he also had difficulty finding windows that would work for them because of seals failing at high elevation. In the end, they did as much as they could toward building a true Passive House but didn’t manage to get the certification.

The biggest regret

As we talked about his house and all its interesting features, Kevin told me there’s one major thing he’d do differently if he had it to do over: omit the solar thermal system and use a ground-source heat pump instead. The solar thermal system has given them trouble several times, and went offline for months last year. It took the contractor a long time to get out there to fix it, and now their two insulated storage tanks are storing water that’s about 55°F instead of a hundred degrees warmer.

Martin Holladay has written a couple of articles about the death of solar thermal systems, and one of his points is that they’re harder to maintain than PV systems. The O’Mearas, I believe, would testify to that. If PV prices had been then what they are now, they may not have gone the solar thermal route at all.

The architect, the builder, and the energy modeler

Sounds almost like a joke: An architect, a builder, and an energy modeler walk into a bar… But wait, we’re talking about Utah here, where most places can sell only the infamous 3.2 beer (3.2% alcohol by weight, 4% alcohol by volume).

I’d never spent much time in Utah before, so I learned about Utah beer laws when I bought a Polygamy Porter after my first day of skiing at Alta. (Their tagline is “Why have just one?”) A quick Internet search told me why it had such a low percentage (4%) of alcohol by volume.

Anyway, the architect, the builder, and the energy modeler on this project are no joke. They are Jean-Yves Lacroix of Lacroix Design (and coincidentally of the Lacroix Skis family), Garrett Strong of Tall Pines Construction, and Troy Harvey of Heliocentric. The video below has clips of them discussing their roles in the project as well as some of the details of the design and construction of this beautiful near-net-zero-energy home. Click below to hear what they have to say and to see more of the house.

The importance of beauty

The two days I spent with Kevin and Svetlana reminded me of two things. First, it reminded me of living in the house that I built because it was so comfortable. A big part of the reason for that is when you have a building enclosure that’s well insulated and airtight, the mean radiant temperatures of the indoor surfaces are much better.

The other thing it reminded me of was Joe Lstiburek’s quote about ugliness: “Aesthetics matter because people don’t take care of ugly things. Ugliness is not sustainable.”

The O’Meara’s home is beautiful! It’s filled with natural light and has amazing views. Looking across the valley, they can see the three Park City ski resorts. The solid hickory floors and fir trim are gorgeous, and it’s clear they spent a lot of time getting the interior design right. And just look at that entrance!

I might mention another point, too: There aren’t many snakes in Park City. Whether that’s because it’s so cold or because St. Patrick paid a secret visit to Utah sixteen centuries ago, we may never know. Any snakes that might stumble — or slither — upon the place, though, would have a tough time getting into this house that even air has to be invited into.

For more about the house, see their website: Sungazing House: O’Meara Residence.

Allison Bailes of Decatur, Georgia, is a speaker, writer, energy consultant, RESNET-certified trainer, and the author of the Energy Vanguard Blog. Check out his in-depth course, Mastering Building Science at Heatspring Learning Institute, and follow him on Twitter at @EnergyVanguard.

2 Comments

  1. Lucy Foxworth | | #1

    Really beautiful home
    You're right, that is a really beautiful home. Beautiful design and execution. Now why did you go skiing on the one of the Little Cottonwood Canyon resorts? Skier's only mountain?

  2. GBA Editor
    Allison A. Bailes III, PhD | | #2

    Response to Lucy Foxworth
    Well, I have a pass that gets me two days at either Alta or Snowbird, and after talking with a number of people, we decided to go to Alta. It wasn't because they don't allow snowboarders...although it was nice not to have to ski over their ruts or worry about getting taken out by one coming off a lift.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |