GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Guest Blogs

Are Solar Roofs Ready to Go Mainstream?

Tesla's Solar Roof has been slow in rolling out, but it's picking up speed and looks like a relative bargain

Tesla is now installing its Solar Roof in 16 states. It appears to be the least expensive of the building-integrated PV options, and cheaper than installing a high-end roof plus a racked solar system. It's more expensive than an asphalt roof plus racked solar. Photo courtesy of Tesla.

Those considering solar for their home have probably heard of solar shingles, solar tiles, and solar roofs. These solar-electric systems have photovoltaic cells integrated into the actual shingles or roofing tiles—a sleeker, more aesthetic alternative to large panels elevated on racks. They may also have heard that solar shingles have had technical problems and are very expensive. In fact, some solar-roof startups have failed, while others survive. So how cost effective are solar roofs, and should you consider one?

Are solar roofs cost effective?

One way to answer that question is to evaluate the leading product in this category—Tesla’s third-generation Solar Roof, the most cost-effective solar roof currently available with the most advanced technology. At $2.11 per installed watt*, the Tesla system beats out DeSol Power Tiles (at about $7  per installed watt*) and Luma Solar Tiles (at about $4.50 per installed watt*) on cost.

It has been shown in one case study, using California electric rates, that the cost of the Tesla Solar Roof can be 53% less than the cost of replacing your roof and purchasing the electricity over 25 years to power the home. Presumably, this would apply to new construction as well as roof replacement. However, the savings would be less in states with lower electric rates, and in existing homes the cost savings depend on having an old roof that needs replacement.

If your roof is ready for replacement or if you are building a new home, the remaining question is how does the Tesla Solar Roof stack up against adding a racked solar system to a standard new roof? Is it worth the money? What are the other pros and cons of a Tesla Solar Roof?

Cost comparisons

In one comparison*, installing or replacing an entire 2000-sq.-ft. roof with the Tesla Solar Roof cost $42,500 versus $34,400 for a standard asphalt-shingle roof with a traditional racked solar system, both with the same 10kw power output. That comes to $2.11 per watt (or $21/sf) for Tesla versus $1.85 per watt (or $17.40/sf) for a standard solar system on a shingle roof. But what if you compare the solar roof to a higher-end, more-attractive, longer-lasting roof? One cost estimate found that the Tesla Solar Roof was considerably cheaper than higher-end roof options, such as metal, tile, or slate, with a racked solar array.*

Tesla solar roof = $56,000

Solar array and shingle roof = $42,000

Solar array and metal roof = $70,000

Solar array and tile roof = $111,000

Solar array and slate roof = $134,000

Clearly, the Tesla Solar Roof can provide significant cost savings over combining standard solar panels with other high-quality, aesthetically pleasing roof types. Now let’s consider other pros and cons of a Tesla Solar Roof.

Pros of the Tesla Solar Roof

There are two types of tiles in a Tesla Solar Roof: Solar tiles with integrated PV cells protected by a durable glass surface and non-solar tiles that are metal and fill in areas of the roof that aren’t suitable or necessary for solar generation. Both tiles are 45 in. by 15 in. and look identical, creating a uniform, aesthetically pleasing look.

According to Tesla, the tempered-glass solar tiles have three times the strength of standard roofing tiles and are more durable than slate or tile roofs. They come with a waterproofing underlayment, flashing, and a ridge cap. The roof is customized to each home and is warrantied against hail damage up to 1-3/4-in.-dia. hail. It is fire-rated Class A UL790—the best fire rating—and has a 130 mph wind warranty.

A Tesla Solar Roof can be installed on a roof pitch ranging from a maximum of 20-in-12 to a minimum of 2-in-12. The cost includes removing the old roof and installing the new one. Tesla-certified contractors coordinate the entire process, including the initial design, the removal of the current roof, installation of the new solar roof, permitting, and ongoing support. Tesla claims that the removal of the old roof and the new installation could be done in 8 to 9 hours, but in reality it may take much longer depending on the installer’s schedule.

The solar system loses no more than 0.5% of its capacity per year and Tesla claims a 30-year operating life—similar to other solar-electric systems. In reality, most high-quality solar systems may still provide 75% of the initial energy production capacity when 50 years old, and the Tesla Solar Roof should, too. Tax credits for a Tesla Solar Roof are based on the cost of the entire solar roof, not just the solar tiles. The solar roof can be integrated with the Tesla Powerwall battery and solar app to optimize solar storage.

The cons

A disadvantage of Tesla’s Solar Roof is that you can only use Tesla-certified contractors, which may result in a longer wait for installation. But that can also be an advantage, because they fully understand the installation of the product. Another drawback is that the solar roof is available only in some zip codes of 16 states.** It is “coming soon” to other areas. The warranty against defects on the roof tiles and on the solar tiles is 25 years, no better than most warranties on an asphalt roof with a standard racked collector. The warranty is not nearly as good as many metal-roof warranties (as long as 30 to 50 years), some tile roofs (up to 50 years), and slate roofs (up to 75 years).

A Tesla Solar Roof is designed to work with the Powerwall, which combines a string inverter with lithium batteries. As a result, the Solar Roof does not have microinverters, so shading some of the solar tiles will reduce production of the entire system. Solar Roofs currently are not recyclable, whereas metal, slate, and tile are. The Tesla roof is available only in textured black tiles, although other finishes and colors will be offered in the future, according to the company.

Would I purchase a Solar Roof?

Having installed several rack-mounted PV systems on new, zero-energy homes and retrofits, I would certainly consider installing a Tesla Solar Roof in both situations. Why? For one, it is less expensive than other high-end roofs, and you have to deal with only one contractor instead of a roofing contractor and a solar installer. You don’t have the dozens of penetrations in the roof that come with a racked system.

Most important, in many areas, including mine, wildfire is a big concern and the Tesla roof has a great fire rating. A metal roof with racked PV would be a good choice for fire prevention, but hail is another matter. We have a fair number of hail storms here and I have seen my neighbors’ metal roofs get badly damaged by hail, as may tile and slate. The Solar Roof has a reasonably good warranty for hail damage. Aesthetically, I prefer looking at a tile roof that is not interrupted with rack-mounted solar collectors, and I like the look of the black textured tiles.

Because it is the least expensive and most technologically advanced of the available solar roofs, Tesla’s Solar Roof is currently the best gauge of the status and cost-effectiveness of solar roofs. Even though evaluating the pros and cons of this system compared to others is a complex endeavor, when I build or retrofit my next zero-energy home, I will definitely consider it. Of course I will check prices and conduct my due diligence, as I recommend everyone do.

The Solar Roof potential

If the Tesla Solar Roof lives up to its potential as a cost-effective, aesthetically pleasing, and durable system, it will greatly expand the number of homeowners willing to go solar and will be used widely in zero-energy homes. If costs come down for the Tesla Powerwall, the integration of the Solar Roof and the Powerwall will increase the storage and production of renewable energy, speeding the development of fully renewable energy grids.


*Since there are so many variables at play, such as roof size, roof complexity, local costs for materials and labor, and efficiency of different PV systems, this comparison is meant only as an example. The key is to get several estimates and compare warranties to determine the actual cost-effectiveness comparison in your specific situation.

** The Tesla Solar Roof is currently available in most zip codes in the following states: CA, OR, WA, TX, NV, NM, FL, IL, NY, NJ, PA, RI, NH, MA, VT, and CO. Check with Tesla if your state is not on this list, because its market area is steadily expanding.

-Joe Emerson is a co-founder of the Zero Energy Project, where this article first appeared. It is republished here with permission.


  1. jkonst | | #1

    I’m intrigued by the technology and the aesthetics of Tesla’s solution, but remain skeptical of their current ability to execute. I would seriously consider this over a metal roof + racked solar on my new home for aesthetics and hail resistance (assuming that claim holds up). That said, I have some concerns:

    - Are they currently able to produce at a reasonable scale? Last I heard they were aiming for 50k roofs / year, but I’m not sure what their current capacity is. Anyone who’s been following Tesla for a while has witnessed some pretty absurd stuff with their solar business (even just this summer, they cancelled orders for people who put down deposits 1-3 years ago, citing service area).
    - Will the roofs hold up? V3 seems like a big improvement over V2 (I recall reading a brutal review involving leaks), but is it as solid as a well-built metal or shingle roof, and will it last?
    - Will they stand by their product? Their warranty seems pretty solid, but how responsive will they be to issues? Customer service seems like a sore spot with their car business, so I wouldn’t expect glowing support with solar, though I am curious if anyone has had experience with this. One thing I just read on their website is this: “If you’re unhappy with your Solar Roof for any reason, let us know within 7 days of power on. We will uninstall your Solar Roof and replace with your choice of roof at the average cost of that roof in the US.” I guess that’s nice and meant to alleviate concerns, but it definitely gives me pause - it almost seems like they are expecting issues, but how horribly wrong does a roof/solar install have to go for you to want out within seven days?!

    I’m interested to hear any thoughts/anecdotes, as Tesla’s solution would be an ideal fit for the house I’m building next year, but I’m having a bit of a hard time believing in them on this one.

  2. b_coplin | | #2

    To me, building integrated pv looks a lot like ground source heat pumps: a boutique solution that doesn't make a whole lot of sense without deep pockets, neighborhood scale investment, or both.

  3. JC72 | | #3

    I wonder whether or not production builders will get on board with this. One one hand it gives them more freedom with regards to orientation so they can increase the number of units built per acre yet on the other hand it might force the builder to accept responsibility for proper install because they can't get a CO w/out a completed roof. Would a CO be given if the roof didn't generate power?

    As it is now from what I've seen on new construction in California solar panels are contracted separately through a third party installer.

  4. andy_ | | #4

    I wouldn't put too much weight on the value of a standard roof's manufacturer warranty. The loopholes are big enough to drive your choice of electric vehicle through. They're dependent on perfect installation, interpretation of what constitutes said perfection, and then prorating the material costs and rarely including any labor.
    The actual warranty that matters on a roof installation is from the company doing the installation and not the manufacturer. In the case of Tesla they're essentially one in the same, so as long as you think Tesla will still be here and is trustworthy then you should be fine.

  5. STEPHEN SHEEHY | | #5

    It looks like the cost per watt numbers assume the entire roof is solar shingles or solar panels. Nobody with a 2000 square foot roof needs 2000 square feet of solar unless they operate an indoor marijuana growing operation. And putting solar panels on the north side of a roof isn't very productive.
    So the more useful numbers would compare a typical solar array of 5-10kw on various types of roofs with a Tesla roof with similar capacity. Not clear how much cheaper the non-profit producing Tesla shingles are compared with the solar ones.

    1. carsonb | | #6

      Stephen, wasn’t that the point of the comparison of the 10kw tesla vs 10kw shingle? Still, that one example was $8k. That’s a lot. The comparison to tile/slate/metal seems like a bit of a stretch. I think Tesla does offer a tile looking roof, but I believe that’s an upcharge?

  6. carsonb | | #7

    Has anyone been able to use them recently? The price drop a few months ago for their panels (not the “solar roof”) blew away local installers. I couldn’t even figure out what areas are serviced from their website and when I went through their website it seemed I needed to put down a deposit to even get a reply. Their chat either gave a spinning icon for an hour or reported an unavailable the two times I tried.

  7. ssnellings | | #8

    Is this article a paid placement? No direct experience with the product, no case studies - the article just endlessly repeats Tesla's marketing materials.

    Anyways, here's someone with direct experience:

  8. Granular | | #9

    Problem is Tesla's new panels are god-awful fugly.

    1. Expert Member
      MALCOLM TAYLOR | | #10


      I am disappointed they don't in some way acknowledge what they are rather than try and mimic other materials. I understand they are trying to fit in with the roofs on existing houses, but there really is no reason for the surface to look like shingles.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |