GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Green Building News

Congress Urged to Save Energy Star Program

In a letter to Congressional leaders, U.S. companies say the 'highly successful' program has saved consumers billions of dollars in utility bills

Energy Star means lower energy consumption. This familiar Energy Guide label from a Bosch dishwasher estimates that the Energy Star rated appliance will use $19 worth of electricity per year, including the cost of heating the water.
Image Credit: Andy Melton / CC BY-SA 2.0 / Flickr

More than 1,000 U.S. businesses and organizations have signed a letter to Congressional leaders urging that they oppose the Trump administration’s plan to withdraw federal funding for the Environmental Protection Agency’s Energy Star program.

The Associated Press reports that major manufacturers such as United Technologies, Ingersoll Rand, and Staples affirmed that Congress should strengthen the program, not weaken it, and that Energy Star has been a successful collaboration between public and private interests. In all, 1,050 businesses and organizations signed the letter.

Energy Star is a voluntary program launched in 1992 designed to encourage energy efficiency in a wide range of consumer products. The program has saved an estimated $430 billion in utility bills in the last 25 years. The EPA says that 85% of the American public recognizes the Energy Star label as a sign of efficiency.

The move to drop the $50 million in annual program costs from the federal budget is part of the Trump administration’s plan to reduce spending at the EPA from $8.3 billion to $5.7 billion a year, a 31% cut. Programs on efficiency and climate change would be especially hard hit.

But many U.S. business leaders say that the plan to defund Energy Star is misguided, says Kateri Callahan, president of the Alliance to Save Energy, an advocacy group that organized the business letter.

“I don’t know who recommended shutting down this program to the president, but I can assure you it was bad advice that would hurt American businesses, consumers, and our overall economy,” Callahan said.

The full text of the letter, sent to congressional leaders on April 24, can be found here.

One Comment

  1. Expert Member
    Dana Dorsett | | #1

    Speculation that it's about personal financial benefit
    CNN tweets & L.A. Times articles point out that there is an upside for the president's private business interest in making Energy Star go away:

    The conflict of interest is real enough, but it's hard to buy into that as a primary motivator. Still it's hard to buy into lots of things regarding this administration, some demonstrably proven, others still speculative.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |