GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Expert Exchange

Getting to Net-Zero Energy

Five building pros from across the country discuss the need for on-site renewable energy and how to get there

In the first Expert Exchange webinar we talk about net-zero (and beyond) energy use in our buildings—why achieving it is important and some strategies for getting there. This topic is garnering a lot of attention as electric grid infrastructure is disrupted by more frequent extreme weather events and the effects of greenhouse gases from fossil-fueled energy demand action. In response, many high-performance home designers and builders advocate for on-site energy production. Having a resilient and renewable power source is critical at this time in human history. Representing a wide range of climate zones, the panelists address the net-zero-energy objective in terms of both new construction and existing buildings. HVAC measures, solar design, battery storage systems, carbon-storing and other alternative building materials, and the need to go all-electric are among the talking points. This far-reaching conversation is both global in scope and granular in detail. Enjoy.

“Solar power is a matter of national security.”—Armando Cobo


Jacob Deva Racusin is Studio Director and Director of Building Science and Sustainability with New Frameworks Natural Design/Build, offering services in renovation, new construction, consultation, and education. As a builder, consultant, designer, and educator, Jacob is able to merge his passions for ecological stewardship, relationship to place, and social justice. Jacob has authored two books and numerous articles, and regularly instructs on topics of building science and climate impact. An active member of the Carbon Leadership Forum, Jacob is engaged in code and policy development, professional training, and other initiatives supporting the transition to a more just industry.

Armando Cobo is a zero-energy custom home designer, trainer, and building consultant with over 35 years of experience. Armando designs following the guidelines of DOE’s Zero Energy Ready Home program, The Building America Program, Build Green New Mexico, California’s Title 24, National Home Builders Association’s Green Building Program, and LEED for Homes, among others. He’s designed over 500 custom homes, and helps homeowners and builders achieve success with their zero-energy projects. He works all over the country.

Todd Usher built Addison Homes on a solid green foundation. After 10 years in the corporate chemical industry, he discovered his passion for construction while renovating investment property. After searching for construction industry best practices, he discovered several green building standards that provided an outline for the Addison Homes quality system. A lifelong learner, Todd has earned three degrees from Clemson University including a BS in Packaging Science, an MBA, a Masters in Construction Science, and is currently a PhD candidate in Planning, Design & the Built Environment. Todd generously shares his knowledge and experience with others in the industry including Clemson students where he is an adjunct faculty member. He strives to bring high-performance, healthy, sustainable, and net-zero construction to the mainstream building industry.

Randy Hafer, cofounder of High Plains Architects, is an architect, developer, and thought leader committed to environmental sustainability, urban revitalization, and historic preservation. Since founding the firm in 1999, High Plains has completed 11 certified historic tax credit projects, 13 LEED Platinum Certified projects, and one Living Building Challenge certified project, Montana’s first. Randy also founded Urban Frontier Development Services, an affiliate of High Plains Architects combining financing tools, capital stack strategies, and design processes to produce local investment opportunities. Randy is currently engaged in redeveloping several historic buildings, bringing new housing and services to vacant historic structures in small Montana communities. Beyond architectural design and development services, Randy provides sustainability consulting for individuals, agencies, larger-scale projects and institutions.

Paul Lukez has been actively engaged in architectural practice, research, and education for 30 years. Before founding Paul Lukez Architecture in 1992, Mr. Lukez worked with nationally and internationally recognized architectural firms such as Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, William Rawn Associates, and Arrowstreet Inc. Mr. Lukez has received over 60 academic and professional honors, and editors of many publications have recognized his work.


Kiley Jacques is senior editor at Green Building Advisor. Photo by Aaron Kraft.


  1. Jacob O'Reilly | | #1

    I love these ideas, but I'm not giving up a gas range for an electric cooktop. Everything else is great.

    1. Charlie Sullivan | | #2

      Absolutely, giving up an gas range for electric coil, or worse, electric smooth top, would be a serious step down in cooking performance. But induction is actually better cooking performance than gas: faster, both in terms of getting up to temperature fast and rapidly adjusting the temperature up or down, and in precise control of heat.

    2. Matteus Olmedo | | #7

      Have you actually used an induction cooktop? I can't think of a single metric in which a gas stove beats an induction. Speed, heat control, safety, efficiency, ease of cleaning, not burning your hands when you grab the pot handle, etc. I'm telling you, you don't know what you are missing.

      1. Dan S | | #8

        Induction is better in nearly every practical way, but a lot of people are attached to the mystique of an open flame. There are some cooking techniques that are easier on on open flame, like charring a pepper or eggplant, though still possible on induction. Charring on an open flame indoors is of course doubly bad for indoor air quality, but that's a whole other topic.

        Furthermore, a lot of marketing has gone into selling and a lot of money has been spent on those big expensive "restaurant style" Viking and Wolf ranges and cooktops. For many people who own those, they are a sort of status symbol, like big gas guzzling luxury SUVs.

      2. Allan C | | #9

        There are a couple advantages to gas. One is cookware; gas is not limited to magnetic cookware, which means no more cheap non stick fry pans for me. The second one is availability and features. There are way more gas ranges and cooktops in various sizes and configurations and features than induction. One only needs to look at the Wolf and La Cornue offerings. Loads of gas with a couple of induction models to tick the box that look like Frankenstein put them together as an afterthought.

        I don't think these advantages outweigh the benefits of induction, but I guess many still do.

        1. Dan S | | #11

          > One is cookware; gas is not limited to magnetic cookware

          Technically, induction stoves aren't limited to magnetic cookware if you use a tool like this:

  2. Expert Member
    Malcolm Taylor | | #3

    There are things I'm not sure most people would be happy giving up for the sake of energy efficiency. Most are understandably related to comfort - like having the house so cold you had to wear a thick sweater all winter, or be unable to do basic tasks because it was so hot. But surely that's a different argument than I'm used to cutting edge performance from my appliances, and will only switch if a comparable or better energy efficient solution exists?

    I worked and socialized with a lot of chefs and cooking instructors. While they were young, most lived in rental units or bought small houses where they didn't have the luxury of gas or induction ranges. Somehow they survived and managed to produce some of the best meals I've ever eaten.

  3. Allan C | | #4

    We are giving up our large pro gas range with built in griddle for a smaller induction cooktop. In the long run, I believe its a good decision for many reasons. Sadly, if this were an investment property or we planned to sell shortly after building, the pro gas range would be installed as anything else would probably affect resale value or at least potential buyers perceived value.

    As a society, I don't think we have turned the corner on gas cooking. It will get there as more municipalities ban gas cooking on new construction. And the topic of having a grid capable of handling all the loads of electric vehicles, heat pumps, cooking ahs been discussed in other blogs and articles.

  4. Bob Irving | | #5

    A gas range produces toxic gases; extremely bad idea in a very tight house. My gas-loving clients are very happy with their induction ranges.

  5. Jonathan Lawrence CZ 4A New Jersey | | #6

    Love my induction, would never go back to gas. A friend of mine who recently built his own net zero house feels the same way.

  6. Expert Member

Log in or create an account to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |