GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Building Science

Does Fiberglass Attic Insulation Really Lose R-Value?

An Oak Ridge study from the early 1990s has led to a lot of confusion

Loose-fill fiberglass attic insulation was shown to lose up to half its R-value in a study from the early 1990s. [Photo credit: Energy Vanguard]

When you get into the world of building science, it’s inevitable that you’ll hear about the Oak Ridge study proving that fiberglass insulation loses about half its R-value. Maybe, though, you’re a homeowner who’s been told about this problem by an insulation contractor warning you not to put fiberglass insulation in your home. Or perhaps this article you’re reading now is the first time you’ve heard of the issue.

However you came to it, though, it’s important to understand what that Oak Ridge study showed and how much of what I said above is actually true.

First, let’s look at the actual research paper on this study (something that many of the people who cite it haven’t done themselves).  Titled Thermal Performance of Fiberglass and Cellulose Attic Insulations, the paper describes the research done by Kenneth E. Wilkes and Phillip W. Childs at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in the early 1990s.  (Download their paper along with the technical bulletins from Owens Corning and Johns Manville described below.)

They set up an attic test module that simulated temperature differences across an insulated attic floor.  You can read all the details in the paper — the sketch from their paper is shown below — but basically they put a whole roof and attic assembly into big chamber and measured the R-values of three insulation types:

What they found is that the fiberglass batts and loose-fill cellulose performed as expected at the whole range of temperature differences.  The loose-fill fiberglass, however, showed a significant reduction in R-value as the attic got colder and the temperature difference got larger.

In fact, the loose-fill fiberglass lost 35% to 50% of its resistance to heat flow at temperature differences of 70°F to 76°F.  The loss of R-value started…

GBA Prime

This article is only available to GBA Prime Members

Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.

Start Free Trial

9 Comments

  1. Charlie Sullivan | | #1

    Thanks. I knew that that the conclusion from that study was narrower than they way its often quoted, but you've made me realize that I too have been overstating it.

    Worst example: I once heard a contractor claim that, at cold temperatures, a fiberglass bat in a wall performs worse than an empty cavity.

    1. User avater GBA Editor
      Allison A. Bailes III, PhD | | #7

      Charlie, I've heard a lot of exaggerated claims based on this study but this is the first time I've heard the one about an empty cavity being better than one insulated with a fiberglass batt. Wow!

  2. User avater
    Jim Baerg | | #2

    Thank you for the much needed clarification. The local insulators I use will appreciate not using cellulose in lids. The conclusion seems to be that air currents WITHIN the FG insulation zone are much better controlled with the reformulated product. Those currents being primarily driven by a temperature differential. I'm still wondering about the comparative performance of FG and cellulose when larger pressure drives are present. This would be when wind or stack effect create air currents through gaps in the ceiling plane. I just did an audit yesterday on a new house with R-60 FG in the lid. The IR scan while depressurizing the house showed lots of air coming out the recessed cans and down into the wall cavities through the top plates. I've often specified R-30 cellulose top dressing over existing FG in existing attics when it is too difficult to completely air seal the ceiling. I wonder if this technique is still justified.

    1. User avater GBA Editor
      Allison A. Bailes III, PhD | | #8

      Jim, I think cellulose is better than fiberglass when there's air leakage because it's more dense. Bruce Harley published an article a decade or so ago about air leakage in cellulose-insulated homes being lower than in fiberglass-insulated homes. Owens Corning, however, says their product beats cellulose in walls when installed at 2.5 pounds per cubic foot. I haven't seen much research on what happens to insulation performance when air moves through it. Building Science Corporation's Thermal Metric Project was going to tackle that but sadly, the project ended before they got there.

      I think your recommendation of R-30 cellulose over existing fiberglass should help the performance.

    2. Armand Magnelli | | #9

      Excellent points Jim. How should this information affect our treatment of homes with existing blown FG insulation installed in the 80's and 90's? And is there a difference in performance between contemporary blown fiberglass or cellulose, taking into account initial cost and changes in thermal resistance over the long term.

  3. Lawrence Martin | | #3

    Interesting. This was the first I heard of this. My recently built home has R72 loose fill fiberglass on the floor of the attic. I recently had some thermal imaging done for an energy audit and the attic looked very warm even though it was pretty cold outside at the time - about 20°F. So far, so good.

    1. user-6982355 | | #4

      LawrenceMartin, if your loose fill FG is resting on the attic floor, shouldn’t you be hoping for a cold attic in winter with the insulation preventing house heat from rising into the attic?

      1. Lawrence Martin | | #5

        Yes, that is correct. I should have pointed out that my thermal imaging was done from the interior. So, I wanted it to appear warm which indicates that the ceiling is holding the heat in the room.

        1. user-6982355 | | #6

          Got it, thanks.

Log in or become a member to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |