GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Building Science

How to Size an ERV or HRV

Advice in choosing a flow rate for a heat recovery or energy recovery ventilation system

Choosing the right size for an energy recovery ventilator is not as obvious as it may seem.

Let’s say you’re faced with the decision of sizing an energy recovery ventilator (ERV) or heat recovery ventilator (HRV). You’ve already decided you’re going with a balanced ventilation system with either heat and moisture recovery (ERV) or just heat recovery (HRV). And let’s say you’ve already figured out what your continuous ventilation rate is going to be. If, say, you’re looking to ventilate at 100 cubic feet per minute (cfm), what size ERV or HRV should you install?

Here’s a LinkedIn poll I did on this topic last month. Which do you think is the best answer?

A LinkedIn poll on sizing an ERV or HRV
A LinkedIn poll on sizing an ERV or HRV

Low, spot on, or high?

If this were an air conditioner or heat pump, the answer would be low or spot on. That’s because Manual J heating and cooling load calculations result in calculated loads that are larger than actual loads. So, at worst, you want to size to what the calculated load is. (I’ve undersized my own heat pump and it works just fine.) Does that hold for ventilation too?

Or should you go to the high side? Going higher than the airflow rate you actually want isn’t the same as oversizing a heat pump or AC. Oversizing a heat pump or AC would have some negative consequences on comfort and humidity control. Would oversizing an ERV or HRV also have drawbacks?

Three reasons to go high

Actually, choosing an ERV or HRV airflow rate higher than the required continuous rate has significant benefits. In the ventilation designs we do at Energy Vanguard, we look for equipment that can move air at twice the continuous rate.

And there’s your official answer to the poll. Well, it’s our official answer anyway. The 33% who chose 200 cfm for an ERV that’s going to run continuously at 100 cfm had the best answer. But why?

1. Boost. The first reason to go with equipment that has a higher capacity than you need for continuous ventilation is so you can boost it when you need more. Not all ERVs let you do this, but it’s a great feature. I recently installed a Zehnder ERV in my house and can boost it by pushing a button.

The switches that turn on the exhaust fan (upper) or boost the ERV air flow rate (below) in a bathroom.
The switches that turn on the exhaust fan (upper) or boost the ERV airflow rate (lower) in my bathroom

That’s a great way to get extra ventilation when you need it. It’s also necessary if you want to eliminate the exhaust fans from bathrooms.

2.  Efficiency. The second reason to go big is for efficiency. If you’ve done research, you know that ceiling fans are more efficient at lower speeds. It’s the same with other fans. (Actually, it’s called efficacy, not efficiency, but I’ll let you decide whether you want to go down that rabbit hole.)

Here are some data I gathered while writing this article. I ran my Zehnder ERV at different airflow rates and looked at the power usage.

ERV data showing decreasing efficiency as fan duty increases
ERV data showing decreasing efficiency as fan duty increases

The column on the right side shows the efficacy in terms of cfm per watt. As I turned up the fan speed, that quantity decreased significantly. That’s why I say you’ll see an efficiency benefit by having your continuous ventilation at less than maximum speed.

But there’s more! What I said above applies only to the efficiency of moving air. The efficiency of heat and moisture exchange also improves when you run at less than full speed. I’ll dive into that topic in a future article.

3.  Flexibility. Finally, having double the capacity you need allows you to adjust your continuous rate to a higher rate. Choosing a ventilation rate can be tricky, so it’s good to be able to have the flexibility to adjust your airflow rate up or down. Of course, reducing the airflow rate is easy even if you chose a 100 cfm ERV to run continuously at 100 cfm. But if you’re already maxed out at 100 cfm, going higher is impossible.

Wrap-up

The bottom line here is that if you’re sizing an ERV or HRV, go big. Doubling the maximum airflow rate from what you need for continuous ventilation gets you the benefits above. But you also have to pay attention to the specifications of the ERV you’re buying. Not all of them have the capability to run at different speeds or go into boost mode. So you have to do your homework.  But now you know that going bigger is better.


Allison A. Bailes III, PhD, is a speaker, writer, building science consultant, and the founder of Energy Vanguard in Decatur, Georgia. He has a doctorate in physics and is the author of a bestselling book on building science. He also writes the Energy Vanguard Blog. For more updates, you can follow Allison on LinkedIn and subscribe to Energy Vanguard’s weekly newsletter and YouTube channel.

4 Comments

  1. charlie_sullivan | | #1

    Great article, addressing all the considerations, concisely.

  2. Goodbar | | #2

    Having additional headroom is also worthwhile if phasing air sealing and insulation projects. Other projects can "accidentally" reduce infiltration like electrifying a natural draft water heater. For my house, encapsulating the attic almost halved my CFM50. That's the rate my ERV was initially set for. Removing the gas water heater, adding a chimney top damper and miscellaneous air sealing dropped another 10%. And I think there's value in monitoring CO2 to evaluate the air exchange rate. With growing kids and the addition of a big dog, we need more (fresh) air!

  3. efishinsea | | #3

    I think it's important to consider up front costs and project goals, in the equation of ideal vs good enough. The 200 CFM ERVs, Broans , Panasonics, cost significantly more than the 130/160s . A lot of builders just want minimum required ventilation , and a 35 watt vs 23 watts at 60-80 cfm doesn't kill a HERS Rating, so it works for them. We typically recommend 160/180s for a 'standard' tight (2-3 ACH50) home . Of course for the clients using Zehnders/Brink , or targeting optimal IAQ/with extensive ventilation distribution etc, more efficient performance for the larger units , that also offer more user control options, are a preferred way to go . Bigger is indeed better, as long as the controls and distribution are dialed also

  4. hvacMENSCH | | #4

    Allison, I believe there may be a key element missing from the design calculus you outlined—the core itself. Manufacturers typically size the core based on airflow rates, providing the physical dimensions corresponding to a given CFM.

    For instance, if an ERV provided by a particular OEM is rated for 200 CFM but is used for a 100 CFM ventilation requirement, the result would be increased surface area, mass flow distribution, and dwell time. These factors directly contribute to improved core effectiveness.

    Additionally, from my perspective, maintaining balanced airflow is fundamental to achieving optimal core performance. Imbalances can compromise heat and moisture transfer, reducing the system’s overall effectiveness. This principle was a central theme in a lunch-and-learn sessions I delivered to consulting engineers back in 2013~2015.

    https://www.slideshare.net/john_chavez/what-is-exchanger-effectiveness

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |