GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Guest Blogs

In Boost for Renewables, Grid-Scale Battery Storage Is on the Rise

Storage systems under construction can power hundreds of thousands of homes

The Moss Landing battery storage project under construction near Monterey, California, is one of many big battery projects underway, a development made possible by advances in battery technology. Photo courtesy EKM Metering.

This post originally appeared at Yale Environment 360.

The twin smokestacks of the Moss Landing Power Plant tower over Monterey Bay. Visible for miles along this picturesque stretch of the Northern California coast, the 500-ft.-tall pillars crown what was once California’s largest electric power station—a behemoth natural gas-fired generator.

Today, as California steadily moves to decarbonize its economy, those stacks are idle and the plant is largely mothballed. The site is about to begin a new life as the world’s largest battery, storing excess energy when solar panels and wind farms are producing electricity and feeding it back into the grid when they’re not.

Inside a cavernous turbine building, a 300-megawatt lithium-ion battery is currently being readied for operation, with another 100-megawatt battery to come online later this year. Together, they will be able to discharge enough electricity to power roughly 300,000 California homes for four hours during evenings, heatwaves, and other times when energy demand outstrips supply, according to project developer Vistra Energy.

These aren’t the only super-sized batteries that will soon be operating at the Moss Landing plant. An additional 182.5 megawatts produced by 256 Tesla megapack batteries are scheduled to begin feeding into California’s electric grid in mid-2021, with plans to eventually add enough capacity at the site to power every home in nearby San Francisco for six hours, according to the Bay Area utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, which will own and operate the system.

Elsewhere in California, a 250-megawatt storage project went online this year in San Diego, construction has begun on a 150-megawatt system near San Francisco, a 100-megawatt battery project is nearing completion in Long Beach, and a number of others are in various stages of development around the state.

California leads the world in high-capacity batteries

Driven by steeply falling prices and technological progress that allows batteries to store ever-larger amounts of energy, grid-scale systems are seeing record growth in the U.S. and around the world. Many of the gains are spillovers from the auto industry’s race to build smaller, cheaper, and more powerful lithium-ion batteries for electric cars. In the U.S., state clean energy mandates, along with tax incentives for storage systems that are paired with solar installations, are also playing an important role.

California is currently the global leader in the effort to balance the intermittency of renewable energy in electric grids with high-capacity batteries. But the rest of the world is rapidly following suit. Recently announced plans range from a 409-megawatt system in South Florida, to a 320-megawatt plant near London, England, to a 200-megawatt facility in Lithuania and a 112-megawatt unit in Chile.

The mass deployment of storage could overcome one of the biggest obstacles to renewable energy—its cycling between oversupply when the sun shines or the wind blows, and shortage when the sun sets or the wind drops. By smoothing imbalances between supply and demand, proponents say, batteries can replace fossil fuel “peaker” plants that kick in for a few hours a day when energy demands soar. Experts say that widespread energy storage is key to expanding the reach of renewables and speeding the transition to a carbon-free power grid.

“Energy storage is actually the true bridge to a clean-energy future,” says Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar and Storage Association.

How quickly that future arrives depends in large part on how rapidly costs continue to fall. Already the price tag for utility-scale battery storage in the United States has plummeted, dropping nearly 70% between 2015 and 2018, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This sharp price drop has been enabled by advances in lithium-ion battery chemistry that have significantly improved performance. Power capacity has expanded rapidly, and batteries can store and discharge energy over ever-longer periods of time. Market competition and rising battery production also play a major role; a projection by the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory sees mid-range costs for lithium-ion batteries falling an additional 45% between 2018 and 2030.

“We’re almost entirely piggybacking on the growth of lithium-ion battery technology, which is driven mostly by electric vehicles and consumer electronics,” says Ray Hohenstein, market applications director for Fluence, an energy storage technology provider with storage projects totaling nearly 1 gigawatt (1,000 megawatts) set to come online in California within a year. The money put into research for those applications is driving down costs across the board, says Hohenstein. “It’s just like what we saw with solar panels.”

In California, falling battery prices, coupled with the state’s aggressive push toward a carbon-free electrical grid by 2045, have led to a packed pipeline of storage projects. A 2013 bill set a target of 1.325 gigawatts of storage to be commissioned for the state’s grid by 2020. With 1.5 gigawatts of projects now approved—including more than 500 megawatts installed so far—that goal has already been surpassed, according to the California Public Utilities Commission.

While there is no precise figure for how much storage California will require to meet its carbon-free goal—the amount depends on the future technology mix, energy use, and other changing factors—some analyses estimate that at least 30 gigawatts of utility-scale storage will be needed by 2045.

A record 1.2 gigawatts in 2020

When the gigantic Moss Landing project becomes fully operational in mid-2021, it will more than double the amount of energy storage in California. Several other states are also now embarking on major energy storage projects. Among them: New York’s 316-megawatt Ravenswood project will be able to power more than 250,000 homes for up to eight hours, replacing two natural gas peaker plants in the New York City borough of Queens. And the 409-megawatt Manatee system planned for South Florida will be charged by an adjacent solar plant. Touted by utility Florida Power & Light as the world’s largest solar-powered battery system, the facility will replace two aging natural gas-fired units.

Nationwide, a record 1.2 gigawatts of storage had been installed through mid-December of last year, according to Wood MacKenzie, a natural resources research and consulting firm. That number is projected to jump dramatically over the next five years, rising to nearly 7.5 gigawatts in 2025. Kelly Speakes-Backman, CEO of the U.S. Energy Storage Association, says that battery storage additions doubled in 2020, and would likely have tripled had it not been for construction slowdowns caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Despite its leadership in renewable energy development, Europe has been slower to get on board with storage. “In general, Europe is a bit more conservative,” says Daniele Gatti, analyst for IDTechEx, a United Kingdom-based market research firm specializing in emerging technology. Energy storage development in Europe has been hindered by a restrictive electricity market dominated by government auctions that tend to undervalue storage. Still, some big-battery projects are now taking shape, including the 320-megawatt Gateway system to be built at a new port facility near London.

Globally, Gatti projects rapid growth in energy storage, reaching 1.2 terawatts (1,200 gigawatts) over the next decade. Key players include Australia, which in 2017 became the first nation to install major battery storage on its grid with the 100-megawatt Hornsdale Power Reserve, and is now planning to add another 300 megawatts near Victoria. The new system will dispatch electricity between states on an as-needed basis, maximizing the efficiency of existing transmission infrastructure and reducing the need for building new power lines that would sit idle most of the time. Similar projects are gearing up in Germany and elsewhere, highlighting an emerging role for batteries as transmission tools.

And Saudi Arabia has just announced plans to overtake Moss Landing’s standing as the world’s largest battery with a massive solar-plus-storage system on the country’s west coast. The facility will provide 100%  renewable energy around the clock to a resort complex of 50 hotels and 1,300 homes being built along the Red Sea.

With a recent report concluding that most fossil fuel power plants in the U.S. will reach the end of their working life by 2035, experts say that the time for rapid growth in industrial-scale energy storage is at hand. Yiyi Zhou, a renewable power systems specialist with Bloomberg NEF, says that renewables combined with battery storage are already an economically viable alternative to building new gas peaker plants. Pairing electricity generation with storage works especially well with solar energy, which generally follows a predictable daily pattern.

In the U.S., costs have also been helped by the federal Investment Tax Credit, a 30% tax rebate for new solar installations. In fact, says Zhou, as more solar energy enters the grid, the cost of operating gas plants actually goes up.

Replacing natural gas generators

Batteries are even beginning to reach a size—around 200 megawatts—that enables renewables to replace small- to medium-sized natural gas generators, Hohenstein says. “Now we’re able to truly build these hybrid resources— solar, storage, wind—and do the job that was traditionally done by fossil fuel power plants,” says Hohenstein, whose company is seeing a surge of interest in such large projects.

Adding storage also makes renewable energy more profitable, says Wesley Cole, an energy analyst with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. “One of the challenges of renewable energy is the more you put on the grid, the more the value declines,” Cole says. Storage helps deal with that by soaking up excess energy that would have been lost in the middle of the day, when electricity demand is lower, and moving it to a time when it is more valuable.

While energy storage is thriving in high-value markets, such as California, battery prices still need to come down more to reach large-scale global deployment. In the U.S., proponents hope the incoming Biden administration will pursue more favorable energy policies, including extending the Investment Tax Credit—which ramps down to 10% for commercial solar systems and ends for residential solar in 2022—and expanding the benefit to stand-alone storage.

Even without further incentives, however, analysts are optimistic that battery prices will eventually drop low enough for widespread energy storage use.

“We see storage being a large player across effectively every future we look at,” says Cole. “And not just one or two gigawatts… but tens to hundreds of gigawatts.”


Cheryl Katz is an independent science writer who covers climate change, energy, earth sciences, and environmental health.

14 Comments

  1. John Clark | | #1

    California should spend its money on fixing their rolling blackouts. Oh wait, that would mean firing up that NatGas powerplant. Naw..can't do that.

  2. Paul Pfeiffer | | #2

    The storage capacities in this article are all in units of power. Would the correct units be understood by tacking hours onto them (e.g. gigawatt-hours instead of just gigawatts)? Or is there some other unit of time implied that people in-the-know would understand?

    1. Expert Member
      Dana Dorsett | | #3

      Peak power is more important than total capacity for most current applications of grid power. Most contracts for gas-peaker replacements require a minimum of 4 hours of some rated power, even if the absolute peak output is higher. When only the rated power is given it's (almost) safe to assume that the total storage capacity is at least 4x RATED power.

      In keeping with that trend, the Moss Landing battery was contracted for 300 megawatts/1,200 megawatt-hours, but it's absolute peak output capacity is likely to be higher, as well as the megawatt-hour capacity (since fully depleting lithium ion batteries takes a toll on longevity & efficiency.)

      The authors of that article could have done a much better job of explaining it, assuming they even understand the difference themselves.

      1. Paul Pfeiffer | | #4

        That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.

      2. PBP1 | | #5

        Great points by Dana, some details/graphs at: https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/bu_1003a_battery_aging_in_an_electric_vehicle_ev

        I imagine charging/discharging/life has been well thought out by those in Moss Landing, would be interesting to see a complete life cycle analysis (cradle-to-cradle including Li mining and comparisons to other tech). Moss Landing weather is pretty steady, not too much variation month-to-month low, ave and high - maybe Moss Landing is a near ideal location for Li battery tech? Wonder how climate/location impacts such a project? Would it be feasible/practical hooked up to wind gen in Palm Springs?

  3. Expert Member
    Dana Dorsett | | #6

    >"Moss Landing weather is pretty steady, not too much variation month-to-month low, ave and high - maybe Moss Landing is a near ideal location for Li battery tech? Wonder how climate/location impacts such a project?"

    There is pretty good economics for 4-hour peaker capacity in almost any US climate/market. Slower more cumbersome "baseload" power can follow the load most days, but 4 hours is good enough to cover the short term shortfalls during peak cooling/heating events without having to maintain spin up a fast ramping gas peaker for only a few 10s of hours per year. This is very different from seasonal storage issues.

    Batteries also deliver extremely competitive frequency & voltage stabilization grid services compared to almost all other grid technologies, since the can swing from full-charging to full discharging in a matter of milliseconds. The Hornsdale Power Reserve project in Australia pretty much oblitherated the auxiliary services market against all comers, and paid for the installation in VERY short (almost unimaginable) amount of time. The value of those services far exceeds that of mere peak bulk power or time-shifting solar & wind output. Keeping fast ramping gas peakers spinning at ultra-low capacity factors to provide those grid services is extremely inefficient and can't come anywhere close to touching the low operating cost of a battery.

    1. PBP1 | | #7

      Thanks, good info on demand/capacity and ROI. Don't know the details on thermal management in such large installs, though some interesting info as to optimal temp and keeping them all at a relatively common temp at: https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2019/04/the-importance-of-thermal-management-of-stationary-lithium-ion-energy-storage-enclosures/

      Also: "The absence of adequate thermal barriers between cells at the Arizona battery storage unit in Surprise, Ariz., allowed the thermal runaway to move from module to module in the array, the investigators said."
      https://www.enr.com/articles/49809-utility-report-on-energy-storage-battery-blast-cites-equipment-flaw

      Maybe GBA has some expertise in this area that could apply to home systems, placing them in conditioned space and/or conditioned garage for battery storage and EV(s)? Making the garage door a real door? If an EV is kept in a conditioned garage (for extreme climates), maybe it's possible to extend battery life/capacity (though at the cost of conditioning)?

      From first link:
      An increase in battery energy storage system (BESS) deployments reveal the importance of successful cooling design. Unique challenges of lithium-ion battery systems require careful design. The low prescribed battery operating temperature (20° to 25°C), requires a refrigeration cooling system rather than direct ambient air cooling. The narrow allowable temperature variation, no more than 5°C between hottest and coldest battery, requires near perfect air distribution. And, the rapid changes in power with time require tight control. Without proper thermal management, overheating cells will degrade, malfunction or even catch fire [2] [3].

      1. Jon R | | #8

        I looked at cooling stationary residential lead acid batteries and in hot climates, it made sense (using a water bath). Would be interesting to know if EV batteries should be cooled (by the garage or the EV itself) when parked.

        1. PBP1 | | #9

          Excellent point, maybe a hose connection for the EV heat pump to extract/dump heat to outside the garage? If the garage is well insulated/sealed, the EV heat pump may be sufficient for heating/cooling the garage, if not possibly more. Just need an umbilical.

          "Tesla is using the thermal mass of the battery to store heat. When they pull it back out they allow the pack temperature to drop to 10C (50F). The amount of heat energy that could be stored in the pack calculates out around 2.5-3 kWh so the battery can hold a decent amount of heat."

          Tesla heat pump:
          https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190070924A1/en?oq=US+2019%2f0070924A1

        2. Charlie Sullivan | | #11

          Yes, some of the newer ones, like the Chevy Bolt, have active thermal management of the batteries, both heating and cooling, whether it's driving or parked. Is less aggressive if it's parked not plugged in, and keeps the batteries in a tighter range when it's plugged in. The cooling is particularly important for battery life; the heating is more about making sure they are ready to provide full power when you first start driving.

          1. PBP1 | | #12

            Great, good things to know - a lot of phenomena to consider. I see the Tesla Powerwall 2 has advanced thermal management:

            Preconditioning — The Tesla Powerwall 2 is the only residential battery system on the market today that offers a full liquid thermal management system, according to Tesla. That translates to a completely sealed, liquid coolant system that circulates the 2.3 L (2.4 quarts) of liquid coolant in Powerwall throughout the battery array to ensure they are operating at the ideal temperature.

            This integrated thermal management positions the Powerwall 2 uniquely in the market with its ability to operate at the widest range of temperatures compared to the competition, functioning from -4°F to 122°F.

            And:
            The biggest issue with any battery is the heat that is caused on charge and discharge. The better the heat is managed in a battery, the longer the battery will last. At best, other solar storage batteries will use a fan to cool the batteries down. Tesla, on the other hand, use what they call “active cooling” and pump a liquid coolant around the cells that make up Powerwall. It is the active cooling that is the reason the warranty can be so generous. A full 10-year warranty with unlimited cycles. This warranty is not matched by any other battery in the industry.

          2. Nola Sweats | | #14

            I have a pair of Powerwall 2's. I think the liquid cooling is a radiator system that circulates fluid that is cooled by ambient air. I.e., there does not seem to be any kind of condenser that actively cools the liquid loop. There's no condenser-type noise or condensation. There is sometimes a very slight fan sound, and you can feel heat coming out of the vents. I guess it's possible there's some kind of thermoelectric cooling that doesn't require a condenser, but I think it's just a liquid system that's air-cooled.

  4. Brian Carter | | #10

    This is all interesting from a tech point of view, but the future will not be won by technology. The present pandemic is proving a perfect model for how human behavior can both outdistance and completely nullify tech.

  5. Gary Gechlik | | #13

    Moss Landing is a great idea, but compare that to Palo Verde nuclear power station. If Northern California had a Palo Verde facility, that would be it, we could all use electrical heat, and electrical cars, and avoid the issue of electrical load ducking. From an economic point of view, PG&E cannot compete on price or service because they lack the energy production, so they are squeezing all the lemon juice out of the lemon. Arizona on the other hand has a lot of lemonade. They planned extremely well and they are prepared for steady growth whereas California has literally hit the electrical supply wall.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |