GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Green Building News

Nevada Net-Metering Regs Are Still in a State of Flux

After successfully lobbying for lower reimbursement rates for electricity generated by PV systems, a Nevada utility now wants to grandfather existing customers

Solar faces an uncertain future in Nevada. Solar installers said they'd pull out after utility regulators passed new net-metering rules, but NV Energy now wants to revisit the issue. This installation is at Silver State Academy in Yerington, Nevada.
Image Credit: Black Rock Solar/Creative Commons license/Flickr

Solar installers and the 17,000 customers who already own or lease photovoltaic (PV) arrays were furious when state regulators decided to apply new net-metering rules to both new and existing systems. Now, NV Energy, the utility on the winning side of that unpopular decision, wants a do-over.

The state’s Public Utilities Commission has set a hearing date of February 8 to consider evidence on the utility’s request to grandfather existing solar customers and allow them to keep the original terms of their agreements for as long as 20 years.

“This grandfathering proposal is being offered in recognition of NV Energy’s desire to treat all customers, including those who had previously made a decision to install rooftop solar, fairly,” NV Energy CEO Paul Caudill said in a news release..

The request comes only a few weeks after regulators approved a plan to triple monthly service charges for solar customers, from $12.75 to $38.51 per month, while gradually lowering the reimbursement rate for electricity from the retail to the wholesale rate over a period of four years.

While the rate changes were bad enough, most galling was the lack of a grandfather clause protecting customers who had already made the decision to invest in a PV array.

In the wake of that decision, solar installers said that they would no longer do business in Nevada and claimed the decision put hundreds of jobs in jeopardy. SolarCity dismantled a training center for solar workers it had only recently opened. And in mid-January, solar customers filed a class-action lawsuit against NV Energy, claiming that they had been misled.

The state’s Bureau of Consumer Protection asked the PUC to rethink its decision and said that existing customers should be grandfathered for at least eight to 10 years. PV Magazine said that petition was withdrawn.

It’s a question of fairness

NV Energy said that it didn’t take a position on the grandfathering question in its original filing with the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) last July.

“We recognize the difficult job that the PUCN, PUCN staff, policy makers, and for that matter, all parties in this proceeding have had in trying to reach decisions on this complex issue,” Caudill’s statement said. “We also understand the history of net metering in Nevada and that a fair, stable and predictable cost environment is important to all of our customers. Our proposal seeks a balance for those who selected solar prior to the implementation of the new rules ordered by the PUCN and those without solar.”

The proposal also would apply to any customers who submitted applications for solar hookups prior to the PUC’s December order.

As Greentech Media reports, even a favorable ruling by the PUC on the grandfather issue won’t change the new net-metering rules. The new monthly service charges and lower reimbursement rates for electricity won’t be up for debate.


  1. Expert Member
    Dana Dorsett | | #1

    The Nevada PUC really stepped in it, didn't they?
    The latest fiasco over not grandfathering in net metering for existing PV is just the tip of the iceberg. Pressure end of NV Energy's monopoly has been building for a long time, and now there's a well financed ballot initiative changing their level of protection in the works:

    If the big casinos bail it'll be interesting to see if the over-built grid get's written down at the NV Energy shareholders' expense, or whether the PUC will put the shareholders' interests ahead of the ratepayers using some new weird-logic akin to how they handled the net metering issue.

    Some variation on this theme will be happening in every state before 2020. It's become part of the US Senate's Energy Bill currrently under consideration, but it's unlikely the House would play along:

    See also:

  2. Expert Member
    Dana Dorsett | | #2

    Looks like the District Court sees it differently than the PUC
    The Nevada court just overturned the revoked net metering and stiffened fixed charges for previously existing solar systems, though they'll still let the PUC, NV Energy and the solar companies et al continue to duke it out over how it's handled in the future:

    That should come as a big relief, and likely retroactive reimbursement for overcharges for those Nevadans who installed PV prior to 2016, many of whom were being set up for a major gouge. That also restores the financial viability of the numerous third-party owned systems previously installed, major factor for the solar companies and customers on a leased solar arrangement.

    This comes on the heels of other proposed agreements approaching sanity on addressing just how badly the Nevada PUC had screwed the existing solar owners/clients last December. It's about time!

Log in or create an account to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |