GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Guest Blogs

Not All Share Equally in the Benefits of Urban Green Spaces

Affluent white communities have greater access than lower-income communities and communities of color

The Platte Farm Open Space in the Denver neighborhood of Globeville was created on a former brownfield site that had become a dumping ground for trash and industrial pollution. Photo courtesy Groundwork Denver.

This post originally appeared at Ensia.

With the arrival of spring, Platte Farm Open Space, located in the diverse, working-class neighborhood of Globeville in north Denver, comes alive with native grasses, pollinator gardens that attract bees and butterflies, and wildflowers, such as Mexican hat, asters, poppies, and Gaillardia.

“This is a beautiful amenity—a beautiful piece of space that was previously being abused,” says Jan Ediger, a longtime resident of Globeville. A former brownfield site, Platte Farm is 5-1/2 acres of open green space in the heart of Globeville that, along with the wildflowers, grasses, and gardens, has walking trails, a play area for children, and a retention pond to help prevent localized flooding.

Development of Platte Farm Open Space was a 14-year journey—a collaborative effort between the community members of Globeville, the city of Denver, and Groundwork Denver, a nonprofit organization that works to create green spaces to help improve community health.

“A lot of people come through here walking and jogging. That never used to be the case,” Ediger says. “We always had a few people coming through on the way to the bus stop, as a pass-through, but now people come here for exercise. We see kids playing, riding bikes, and their parents come with them.”

Health disparities and access to green space

Urban greenery, such as the shortgrass prairie of Platte Farm Open Space, benefits people’s health and recreation. But access to nature is unequal for lower-income communities and communities of color compared to affluent white communities.

This past summer, the Center for American Progress and the Hispanic Access Foundation released a report finding that communities of color experience “nature deprivation” at three times the rate of white Americans. According to the report, 74% of communities of color live in nature-deprived areas, with Black communities experiencing the highest levels of deprivation.

Chart showing access to urban nature areas by ethnicity
A report from the Center for American Progress and the Hispanic Access Foundation found that communities of color experience “nature deprivation” at three times the rate of white Americans. Chart courtesy Center for American Progress.

Meanwhile, in a 2019 study, researchers at the University of British Columbia examined 10 U.S. cities, including New York, Chicago, Houston, and others, and found that Latino and Black communities have less access to urban nature than white communities. “The widespread green inequities uncovered by this research are serious issues in the context of the effects of urban vegetation on [human] health and well-being,” the authors write. “Urban residents with lower access to urban vegetation, according to our analyses, are also those who are most likely to experience poor public health outcomes that could potentially be mitigated by adequate exposure to urban vegetation.”

In fact, a growing body of evidence shows that access to green space in urban areas can bring considerable benefits to the health and well-being of city residents. These benefits may include improved cognitive development and functioning, reduced symptom severity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reduced obesity, and positive impacts on mental health. Looking forward, the University of British Columbia researchers write, the “impact of urban vegetation exposure on the health and well-being of marginalized communities may become even more critical as climate change worsens.”

Jennifer Wolch, a professor of city and regional planning at the University of California, Berkeley, says these health benefits stem primarily from opportunities for residents to get outside and get active.

“Many epidemiological studies have shown that people who have better access to green space have higher rates of physical activity,” Wolch says. “One of the key problems facing inactive people is that they are at a higher risk of chronic disease, such as diabetes, heart problems, and sometimes cancers. Since access to places to play—whether for team sports at a park or simply hiking in a nature preserve—is positively related to levels of physical activity, these are important elements in keeping people healthy.”

Resources and strategic partnerships

“Platte Farm Open Space really is the epitome of a community-led project,” says Cindy Chang, the executive director of Groundwork Denver. “The residents of Globeville had a vision for this land as being an open park that anyone in the community could enjoy. This was a unique process because the community was at the table for almost every design meeting, almost every construction stage, and they even helped decide which kinds of trees would be planted. They were involved in the details in a way that Denver has almost [never taken in terms of designing] a park.”

Through a process of remediation, contaminated land was replaced with fresh layers of topsoil, and is now home to prairie habitat that attracts foxes, rabbits, birds, and butterflies.

The necessary financial resources to make Platte Farm a reality—money for the purchase of the land, remediation of the soil and planning of the site—weren’t always easy to come by.

For example, in 2013, Xcel Energy and the environmental nonprofit WildEarth Guardians concluded a legal settlement in which Xcel agreed to pay Groundwork Denver $447,000 to fund energy efficiency and other clean energy projects in neighborhoods in north Denver impacted by air pollution, while channeling the remaining funds toward Platte Farm. In addition, Platte Farm received a $550,000 grant from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to help with the construction and maintenance of the site, bringing the project’s total cost to about $1 million.

Strategic partnerships between a steering committee made up of Globeville community members, Groundwork Denver and the City of Denver also played a vital role in making Platte Farm a reality, particularly given the need for the community of Globeville to have some sort of institutional backing. “Unfortunately, people don’t listen to autonomous communities,” says Ediger. “In a way you have a voice, but it’s not an official voice.”

City-wide policies also helped Platte Farm. “More recently, the city committed to having open space within a 10-minute walk of any resident of Denver,” says Chang. “Platte Farm Open Space allowed them to hold to that commitment in Globeville.”

Chang also notes that the passage of a ballot measure known as Measure 2A was a great achievement for Denver-based environmental justice leaders working to ensure that diverse communities have access to urban nature. The measure, approved by voters in 2018, calls for a quarter percent increase in Denver’s sales tax to be channeled toward expanding the city’s park system.

Healing spaces

While Platte Farm offers an example of a successful community-led green space initiative in a lower-income, diverse neighborhood, many communities of color in metropolitan areas are still nature-deprived.

Limited financial resources for environmental justice organizations, green gentrification, and redlining are among the many obstacles that have resulted in inequitable access to green space, worsening health disparities among urban communities.

Alessandro Rigolon, an assistant professor in the department of City and Metropolitan Planning at the University of Utah, says that city council members often prioritize some voices over others, which can lead to limited investments for green initiatives in lower-income, diverse neighborhoods.

“Political discussions are often steered by who has the loudest voice,” says Rigolon. “Oftentimes community meetings are designed to empower wealthy, white homeowners and do not give voice to low-income renters of color.”

Rigolon recommends that green equity groups locate city officials who will be advocates for their work. “They certainly need support from elected officials,” he says. “They need champions among the elected official community, both at the local and state levels.”

Another challenge when trying to address health disparities resulting from inequitable access to urban nature is financing, since buying land and building and maintaining parks can be an expensive endeavor.

Jonathan Pacheco Bell, an urban planner who for much of 2020 was a program manager for a nonprofit organization working on park inequities, emphasizes the critical role that funding plays—and also how this particular challenge has, as many others have, been exacerbated by the pandemic.

“When Covid-19 hit, some of our funding was redirected to frontline workers to address the pandemic directly. And, while we understood why, it still presented a challenge to us because it was funding that we relied upon,” he says.

“We need the resources to get folks comfortable and back into our gardens and park spaces,” Bell continues. “We know that these open spaces are healing spaces—that they allow people to get outside, and that brings them mental and physical wellness.”

Ambika Chawla is a climate policy writer and journalist. This article was supported by a diversity grant from the National Association of Science Writers (NASW).


  1. SierraWayfarer | | #1

    Yep, the affluent and powerful always have more of the good, and that is in all economic systems.

    I was in the main city park in Avondale AZ, an affluent suburb to the North of Phoenix, and a sign on the bathroom said that if you were not a resident of Avonadale it was illegal for you to be in the park. I guess they felt they had a problem with the homeless. I didn't see any homeless people.

  2. krom | | #2

    More political agenda bullshit....

    1. n7ws | | #8

      Agreed. When will it ever end?

      1. Expert Member
        MALCOLM TAYLOR | | #9

        The strength of GBA is the high level of technical information that is posted and exchanged here. For posters who don't want to engage in issues they feel are outside that, my suggestion would be that rather than spend their time complaining about articles that may address things they aren't interested in, that they more fruitfully use their time to help contribute to the technical knowledge base we all appreciate. Use y0ur contributions to the site, rather than your complaints, to push it in the direction you want.

  3. BirchwoodBill | | #3

    Too bad the study had an underlying agenda. Did they ask the question if people owned their homes and did they know how pick up after themselves? Ignore the color of the skin and look at personal behavior. What are the behaviors that create green spaces?

  4. ar_t | | #4

    Dear GBA,

    I believe this issue (article) is an inappropriate use of the space. I believe most of us read and belong to GBA because we are trying to make our own homes or those we build for others more durable, more environmentally friendly, and safer and healthier for its occupants. We might be accused of killing children, if we throw away all the literature we receive in the mail on a daily or weekly basis, asking for monies for all the maladies people suffer throughout the US and the world. A lot of us give our time and our money, if we can afford it, to many things. We cannot solve all the problems in the world on this website. Perhaps a link to such an article would be more appropriate and allow those to peruse the article offline. There are questions concerning this article that have nothing to do with green building.

  5. mdb_az | | #5

    I support the inclusion of this article and commend the editorial staff of GBA for including it.

    1. Expert Member
      Michael Maines | | #6

      Same here, Armin. There is a lot more to green building than how much/little energy we use.

    2. maine_tyler | | #7

      +1 (not that we're voting.) It is possible to not read something if it doesn't interest one. Unless some people are hooked directly to the GBA matrix and are being force uploaded the articles.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |