GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Policy Watch

Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” Will Undo the Inflation Reduction Act

The proposed bill threatens several tax credits that have helped millions of households achieve greater energy efficiency and independence

The Trump administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (yes, that is its formal title), which was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last month, proposes to “modify, phase out, and terminate multiple energy-related federal tax credits,” according to the bill’s summary, under the subsection “Make America Win Again.”

The patent cruelties embedded in this bill have the potential to decimate livelihoods and economies for a generation or more, not to mention cost actual lives. Setting aside many of the bill’s controversial proposals, like cuts to Medicare and Medicaid benefits, a 10-year moratorium on any state-led efforts to regulate AI models, and repealing EPA block grants that benefit disadvantaged communities, among others, the Big Beautiful Bill (BBB) is particularly preoccupied with getting rid of all manner of tax credits that, to date, have helped millions of builders and homeowners save money and live in healthier buildings.

If passed by the Senate in its current form, which for the time being seems unlikely, the BBB would gut most key provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), effectively killing the law in piecemeal. (I’m already eating my words after declaring last January that “the IRA will not be repealed.” There is a slim chance this will hold true, but I humbly join a cast of millions who clearly underestimated Trump’s appetite for gutting industries and local economies in deep red states and districts, where much of the IRA’s funding has been directed.) So let’s explore just a few of the home-specific tax credits that are on the chopping block, and the possible impacts of them going away.

The Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (25C)

The 25C tax credit was first introduced through the Clean Energy Act of 2005. In its original form, it offered homeowners a fixed (and rather modest) credit, with a cumulative lifetime cap of just $500, for upgrading their HVAC equipment, water heaters, insulation, windows, doors, and other critical features. The benefits were minimal, but the implied gesture of incentivizing people to convert to Energy Star appliances and make other energy efficient upgrades was significant, nonetheless.

With the passage of the IRA in 2022, the 25C credit was amended in several ways, all representing marked improvements on previous iterations. For starters, the maximum allowable credits were increased to 30% of qualified expenses, or up to $3,200 per year, including up to $2,000 for heat pumps and related equipment, and $1,200 for other efficiency measures like doors, windows, insulation, and home energy audits. Also of note, the annual credit was extended through the end of 2032, enabling homeowners to plan and phase various home improvement measures over the long term.

Recent figures published by Rewiring America indicate that in 2023, more than $2 billion in credits were claimed, representing tax relief of $880 per household on average. “For every dollar homeowners received through 25C, contractors generated ten dollars in energy-efficient product sales. That kind of return is rare in federal policy,” according to the nonprofit.

Of the millions of households that took advantage of the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit, new insulation and air-sealing, as well as new exterior windows, doors, and skylights made up the highest percentages of tax credit claims by category. Interestingly, the installation of water heaters and/or furnaces that use “efficient natural gas, propane, or oil” also made-up sizable portions of claims, which supports the claim made in a joint, bipartisan letter submitted by a group of congressional members that the “25C tax credit is fuel agnostic.” (A co-author of the letter includes Rep. Jason Smith, a Republican representing Missouri’s 8th Congressional District, and notably the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.)

“Energy-efficient homes are more resilient in extreme weather; energy-efficient homes are healthier homes; and building energy efficiency enables utilities to better manage demands on the electrical grid,” the letter reads. “It is for these reasons that we urge Congress to maintain the current 25C tax credit.”

The Residential Clean Energy Credit (25D)

Like 25C, the 25D tax credit was also introduced as part of the 2005 Clean Energy Act. The 25D credit directly benefits households that install any form of clean, renewable energy for new or existing properties, and applies to both homeowners and renters, provided the home in question is their principal residence. Qualifying expenses include solar panels, solar water heaters, geothermal systems, wind turbines, fuel cells, and starting last year, battery storage equipment.

The initial payback for the 25D credit was comparatively generous, capped at 30% of expenses, including equipment and installation. One possible reason for this is that, unlike insulation and energy efficient windows, renewable energy technologies were mostly out of reach for the average household 20 years ago. Over time, as the marketplace for solar panels and related systems became more accessible, the applicable percentages dropped a few points. But with the arrival of the IRA, the 30% cap was restored to the Clean Energy Credit and extended through the end of 2032. Recent figures from the Treasury Department indicate that in 2023 taxpayers who installed rooftop panels and home battery storage saved an average of nearly $5,100 in credits, while reaping annual savings of $2,230 on their energy bills.

While the 25D credit has greatly benefitted hundreds of thousands of households, particularly when it comes to solar panels (25D is commonly known as the residential solar tax credit), it has also been a boon for solar installers. According to data from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), in partnership with Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables, a record 178,812 solar installers and developers were employed in 2023. For the same year, that number increases to nearly 280,000 (another record) when including U.S. manufacturers, sales and distribution, and operations and maintenance workers.

Whatever happens with the BBB, in the likely event the solar tax credit goes away at the end of 2025 as proposed, the recourse is clear: for any homeowners who have even a passing interest in installing solar and battery storage (a process that can take several months), it’s best to do it now. The clock is ticking.

The New Energy Efficient Home Credit (45L)

The 45L tax credit, also established through the Clean Energy Act, had previously expired in 2021. This credit specifically benefits builders of new energy efficient homes of all types, from single-family to manufactured and multifamily buildings. The credit was brought back with the passage of the IRA, and in the process raised credits to $2,500 for single family and manufactured homes that meet specific Energy Star standards based on the year built (e.g., homes built after 2024 must meet standard 3.2).

Meanwhile, homes in those same categories built to the Department of Energy’s Zero Energy Ready Home program qualify for a $5,000 tax credit, while multifamily homes that meet Energy Star’s Multifamily New Construction program may qualify for $2,500 per unit, provided construction workers are paid prevailing wages. And like 25C and 25D, the IRA extended the 45L credit through the end of 2032.

According to a 2025 report released by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), the 45L credit was instrumental in the construction of nearly 350,000 energy efficient homes in 2024. The cumulative effect of this new construction is estimated to cut peak energy demand by 1,800MW by 2032. “We estimate that the discounted energy savings benefits are more than four times the value of the credit,” concludes the report. Should the credit remain in place, which again, doesn’t seem likely, the ACEEE estimates that it “will spur the construction of over three million qualifying homes between now and its scheduled expiration in 2032.”

An accelerated timetable

Shortly after the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, in 2022, GBA contributor and home contractor Jon Harrod deftly broke down the various benefits and potential complications of the amended tax credits. In his closing he wrote, “The ethical course is to share what we know with customers in a balanced and transparent way, then let them decide how to proceed. Once we get through this awkward launch, the IRA will help us stay busy for years.”

Harrod’s prudence is admirable, but now, unfortunately, somewhat outdated. In the likely scenario that some amended version of the BBB passes this year, some or all the credits mentioned above (as well as others) will either be terminated or phased out, at which point homeowners will have mere weeks to implement the kinds of improvements and upgrades that they’ve been planning for years.


Justin R. Wolf is a Maine-based writer who covers green building trends and energy policy. His latest book, House Up on the Hill: The Revolutionary HMTX Headquarters, was just published by Ecotone.

10 Comments

  1. david_king | | #1

    The IRA's transferability of tax credits was an indispensable part of getting large and small projects commercial funded. This provision will soon disappear under the current version of the bill. Another poison pill in the proposed legislation from the House is the stringent domestic content requirement that becomes virtually impossible to comply with due to lack of US sources for many small parts down t0 nuts, bolts and washers.

  2. Deleted | | #2

    “[Deleted]”

  3. n7ws | | #3

    "The patent cruelties embedded in this bill have the potential to decimate livelihoods and economies for a generation or more, not to mention cost actual lives."

    Wow. If the author would stop hyperventilating. perhaps he could answer one semi-rhetorical question that covers this whole topic.

    Why should I, through my taxes, buy you an electric automobile?

    1. Justin R. Wolf | | #5

      Yes, this law will cost lives via cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. Yes, it will hurt livelihoods by closing manufacturing plants and hospitals and nursing homes and community centers.

      To your question: no one is buying anyone else an EV (or solar panels or battery storage, etc) with their tax dollars; they're subsidizing tax credits. But if you insist on drawing a straight line between the two, then my answer is this: because it's part of larger investments in the clean energy economy, which results in cleaner air, a more reliable grid, and lower energy bills.

      If you don't want your tax dollars to help subsidize that energy transition, you're of course entitled to your opinion and politics. But I offer this: starting as early as this fall, instead of *OUR* taxes funding such programs, they will now go towards things like subsidizing the fossil fuel industry and the construction of "Alligator Alcatraz", to cite just two examples. I can't speak for you but personally I'm not cool with that.

    2. conwaynh85 | | #8

      N7ws,
      Careful, if you disagree with the mob, they will accuse you of canceling their view point. This group does not like dissenting opinions on political issues. Ask me how I know.....I wish this incredible resource that we all appreciate would stay out of politics and focus on quality building.

      1. Expert Member
        Michael Maines | | #9

        You can always choose to ignore threads you find to be political.

  4. PracticalGreen | | #4

    When subsides are provided by BigGov, the free market is skewed. Some folks benefit, others don't, and the piper must be paid with interest. Taking a look at these two bills from a skeptical viewpoint, we have Bill No.1: Print money, give it away, even as the ecomomy was on the upswing from the debacle of lockdowns. Grow the nanny state and call it GDP. Debt and interest are irrelevant, provide no accountability for spending. Name the bill the opposite of its actual effect as inflation soars, and the standard of living of the average American drops. Or take Bill No.2: Cut taxes, cut regulation, stimulate private enterprise. Bet on American ingenuity, and try to re-instill the pride of work to raise the standard of living. At least slow the rate of increase in BigGov spending. Pray to grow your way out of debt. DOGE shows the way to long overdue reform, but who has the stomach for it? Trim a bit of waste, but then roll out the pork because re-election is at stake. Still, if I had to choose...

    1. pmf823 | | #7

      Your argument seems nonsensical to me given how many different industries and programs our govt already subsidizes. Why should our tax dollars go to farmers for growing corn or sugar cane? Or any other program that's still supported by the current admin, of which there are hundreds at least. The point of green energy subsidies is to jump start that industry and level the playing field so the costs come down enough so the green energy programs can achieve the same economies of scale of more mature industries. Then those subsidies are supposed to be ended once the industry can compete better. I've no doubt the IRA was imperfect, but how can you bring this up without mentioning everything else the gov't still supports and wonder who's lining who's pockets here??? Look at history. Our gov't built our entire system of roads to promote the auto industry. There are just so many examples of this. You're letting yourself parrot the talking pts of big oil and other malevolent players.

      1. PracticalGreen | | #10

        So we kind of agree? The farm subsidy is perfect example. Begun with good intention in a time of need, we have created an industry that has decimated the soil, is dependant on toxic pesticides & GMO crops, and subsidizes bizarre products like high fructose corn syrup. There is an alternative, Regenerative Farming- that sequesters nutrients in the soil, and has been demostrated at scale. Many farmers would love to make the leap, but are caught in a debt trap fueled by perverse incentives. Watch the film Common Ground (2023).

        Green Energy has similar problems. One example- Were not original subsidies meant to encourage solar panel production in America? Instead we now subsidise a nasty supply chain of toxic mining in Africa, and obstensibly slave labor in China, so we can buy cheap panels (not to mention the kill-switches) and score CO2 credits. Sure big oil and coal have had thier agendas and subsidies as well, but let's not be blind to the full impacts and real problems of green energy, including grid capacity & response. See how quickly nuclear has come back onto the table with growing AI, though it will take years to get moving.

  5. Deleted | | #6

    “[Deleted]”

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |