GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Musings of an Energy Nerd

Vegetated Roofs

As California homeowners are urged to replace the grass in their yards with decorative gravel, why would anyone try to grow grass on their roof?

Vegetated roofs are more common on large commercial buildings than single-family homes. This vegetated roof is in Paris, France.
Image Credit: Image #1: Martin Holladay

Vegetated roofs are low-slope roofs the have enough soil (or soil-like growth medium) on top of the roofing to support the growth of grass, wildflowers, or shrubs. Although some people call this type of roof a “green roof,” the term “vegetated roof” is more accurate and less confusing.

Vegetated roofs can be humble or sophisticated. In Scandinavia and the Great Plains of North America, these roofs used to be called “sod roofs.” Most sod roofs were installed by poor people in rural regions, and most sod roofs leaked. Later versions of the sod roof included a waterproof membrane under the sod, improving performance.

In the early 1970s, Malcolm Wells, a widely respected green architect, began preaching the gospel of underground architecture. Wells took his vegetated roofs seriously; he famously noted that his definition of an underground house was a house with enough dirt on top to grow mature trees. Interviewed at his underground house in 1999, he said, “I have three feet [of dirt] here, but if I had to do it again, I’d put about 10 feet of earth up there, so it could be a truly natural habitat for all plants.” He bragged that his roof had “a couple of pine trees, now about four feet tall.”

These days, most vegetated roofs have better specifications than the old sod roofs, but less impressive specifications that Malcolm Wells’ 10-foot-deep ideal. Most vegetated roofs have between 3 inches and 6 inches of soil. That’s not enough to create a natural habitat; it’s just enough to create a kind of ersatz pasture — one that looks green if you remember to water it.

Why install a vegetated roof?

Vegetated roofs are quite expensive. While some architects estimate that…

GBA Prime

This article is only available to GBA Prime Members

Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.

Start Free Trial

3 Comments

  1. Malcolm Taylor | | #1

    Roof top gardens
    I'm not sure you can even consider them a sub-set of "green" roofs, but where roofs are already designed as patios or terraces, roof top gardens in planters have traditionally been used to both improve the ambiance and produce flowers and vegetables. These seem like the only variant that has a long track record of making sense.
    I'd wager the group least likely to champion vegetative roofs are builders like me, who have already spent enough sleepless nights worrying about potential leaks in their conventional roofs, without adding more complexity to their projects.

  2. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #2

    Response to Malcolm Taylor
    Malcolm,
    You're right that there is a spectrum of green roofs, and that one end of the spectrum includes a wood deck or stone-flagged rooftop patio with some planters.

    In Portland, Maine, I saw a roof that is hard to categorize, but it's somewhere along the vegetated roof spectrum. It's the roof over the architectural office of Rick Renner. It's a black membrane roof -- not necessarily the type of roof where most people would want to hang out, but at least there are stairs leading up to the rooftop. Renner has installed shallow trays filled with soil; he describes the plants in these trays as "low-maintenance perennials."

    .

  3. Malcolm Taylor | | #3

    Why
    The criteria I would suggest for including vegetative roofs is probably as far from a logical building science perspective as is possible. It would be that it was a necessary component to the building design. That it "just had to be". That means they would be reserved for those very few projects that cried out for them, not adopted as a matter of necessity or principle. I think this cabin by Snohetta embodies this idea.
    http://snohetta.com/project/180-bjellandsbu-akrafjorden

Log in or become a member to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |