Location of Sub-Slab Insulation in Relation to Footings
One sketch shows the sub-slab insulation is BETWEEN the top of the footing and the bottom of the slab. The other sketch shows the bottom of the slab in direct contact with the top of the footing (NO insulation between them).
1) Is there a strong preference for one location vs the other? By placing the insulation between the slab and the footing, the direct thermal conduction path is broken. That would improve the overall R-value of the wall and footing but are there undesirable side effects? Is one better from a structural point of view or does one method better fit the sequence of operations in constructing a basement?
2) One sketch shows a vertical piece of rigid foam placed between the side edge of the slab and the concrete wall and the other shows no foam (only a caulked joint). Again, the foam breaks the thermal conduction path but it seems like it would be begging for termites to enter anywhere under the slab, go through the foam between the slab and wall and continue up the interior basement wall foam insulation to anywhere in the house. A metal termite shield could be placed on top of the basement wall but apparently the effectiveness of the termite shield is questionable. Any tips to reduce the possibility of termites entering through the foam?
I understand that building is a compromise – you can’t have it all. If the goal is to build a high quality, long lasting, energy efficient building, what would you go with? Location is southern, middle TN (very southern edge of climate zone 4A but also just across the line from what’s considered “very heavy” termite probability area.)
Thank you for your help.
GBA Detail Library
A collection of one thousand construction details organized by climate and house part