Choosing attic insulation
I have a project at hand that includes installing approx. 900SF of insulation on an attic floor. The home is two-story and the roof pitch is 12:12. It’s a large attic with the usual soffit and ridge ventilation as well as a couple of gable vents. Existing insulation is 6″ unfaced fiberglass laid between the 2×6 truss chords, circa 1995, and probably not very effective at all. It has becomes contaminated with bat droppings and needs to go. Climate is coastal Washington, generally mild, approx. 5100 HDD.
At the moment I have two proposals from insulators in hand. One is for a fiberglass batt installation, with R-21 laid between the chords and R-38 laid perpendicular over that. The installer is well known to me and he is meticulous. The other is for loose-fill, either cellulose or fiberglass, at R-60. In order of cost, the batts are lowest, followed by the blown FG and then the cellulose.
My understanding is that all of these materials will suffer some degree of convective “heat stripping” in an open attic installation. My question is, which of these installations will perform the best, and by what sort of margin? I realize this may not be easily quantifiable, but would appreciate any comments. People in this market are accustomed to seeing minimally-effective batt installations in almost every situation, and few have any sense that improvements can be had, or what they’re worth.
GBA Detail Library
A collection of one thousand construction details organized by climate and house part