GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Low static compact duct: supply register relative location and through velocity

rajibroy | Posted in Mechanicals on
Am a mechanical engineer and to-be-homeowner of an almost ” Pretty Good House” in Hartford, VT (CL 6A). After BEOpt modeling and Manual J calculation: cooling load for the two story 1500 sq.ft. space is 16 kBTUH. I am planning to use low-static, compact ducted units (a 9 kBTUH for 2nd floor bedrooms, and another 12 kBTUH for the 1st floor living+kitchen+dining+guest bed) from preferably Fujitsu, if not Mitsubishi. I am planning to have dropped ceiling in the 1st story and plenum truss on the 2nd story to accommodate the air-handlers and duct-work.
I have studied articles here in GBA, and Energy Vanguard and Manual S, T and D calculations, and ACCA Manual D quick start tutorials. I am following direction from _John Semmelhack and Benjamin Knopp_ provided in their NAHC 2018 presentation:
Duct System Design “Rules
• All ducts in conditioned space
• Central returns
• Smooth turns for all trunks
• No turns with flex duct
• 450 fpm in-duct velocity
• Standard/mediocre takeoffs and boots
• Size supply registers for throw (but don’t hit people)
• High-efficiency, “over-sized” filter
• Balance every system, learn from mistakes

To avoid Garbage-in_garbage-out with Manual D,  
• What should be the a good  thorough velocity from supply registers? Does curved blade registers archive good mixing while not hitting people in the room?
• What to keep in mind about relative location if supply register in reference to return grill, ERV/HRV diffuser? 
• Does home run type distribution is easier to balance than trunk-branch system?
• In case of central return, is the over-the-door transfer grill recommended? 

Thank you for your kind attention! 
Note: Ductwork seems more costly than the outdoor and indoor unit combined! This lead me to use a split ( 9 + 12 k system instead of a 18 k combined system). I will also have a Rheem type indoor Heat-pump water heater (HPWH); With reduced system capacity in frigid winter coupled with a indoor HPWH, the over-sizing might be justified!   

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.


Log in or create an account to post an answer.


Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |