GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon

Community and Q&A

To caulk or not, above a 1925 redwood window head jamb?

Bryce Nesbitt | Posted in General Questions on

I was just pulling out the caulk gun, when I noticed this head jamb is tapered.

The house is 1925 stucco in USDA zone 10b (San Francisco Bay Area). So did the original builders intend this as a form of weep? Instead of caulk is it actually better to leave the edge open, or cut a weep into the caulk?

The stucco wall in question is settling, and has various patched cracks. So, in theory at least, water may weep down the old tar paper behind the stucco, during the rainy season. The walls are at least partially filled with cellulose, which reduces drying to the interior lathe and plaster.

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #1

    Bryce,
    I'm an advocate of caulk-free siding. In general, you shouldn't see any caulk around windows or siding. Free drainage and air movement are what you want when it comes to siding and window trim.

    All this presupposes, of course, that the wall has an air barrier somewhere -- either at the sheathing level or the drywall level.

    The trouble with an old house is that you don't know what type of water-resistive barrier (WRB) or flashing (if any) is hiding behind the siding. But unless you have a specific problem that you are trying to solve, and you know what you are doing, put away the caulk gun. Save the caulk for the interior of your home.

  2. Bryce Nesbitt | | #2

    Based on elsewhere, the wall is probably lathe & plaster inside, board sheathing, and a single layer of tar paper, then furring nails wire and stucco. Here there's no overhang or roof line above (Mediterranean style). Thus water sheets down the wall, and wind could push a fair amount back into the crack.

    The tar paper probably ends on the tapered head jamb with no other flashing. The condition of the tar paper is likely mixed.

    In many other buildings that head jam appears to be made from a flat piece of wood. Here it appears to have a deliberate taper out. For a flat jamb would you caulk?

  3. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #3

    Bryce,
    My answer is unchanged. No caulk -- unless there is a very specific water entry problem, well diagnosed, that you are trying to solve.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |