GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Building Matters

Choosing Sustainable Building Materials

Free software from the National Institute of Standards and Technology is designed for specifying green products

To perform an analysis of gas vs. electric HVAC systems in energy-efficient Maryland homes, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted computer simulations of their Net-Zero Energy Residential Test Facility using a unique toolset of databases and software known as BIRDS (Building Industry Reporting and Design for Sustainability). Image courtesy NIST.

Specifying sustainable building products is challenging because every material category includes a broad range of brands, each calling itself “green,” for lack of a better term. BEES software offers an objective means of comparison. Developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), BEES software measures the environmental performance of building products by using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach specified in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 series of standards. Those standards include a building material’s impact on global warming and other measures of environmental performance. The chart below shows the inputs that go into each of three divisions.

The chart below (Fig. 1) shows the inputs that go into each of the three divisions.

Environment and economics

The acronym BEES stands for Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability. The software includes an economics analysis feature that helps building material specifiers include life cycle costs as a criterion. It also serves to scale up utilization. When a product offers good environmental performance and remains cost-effective, it gets specified. If not, it doesn’t. “If it’s not economically viable, it’s not sustainable,” according to Joshua Kneifel, Ph.D., an economist and team lead for BEES at the Engineering Laboratory at NIST.

Dr. Kneifel continues to improve the BEES software to offer greater customization and reporting. For example, the economic analysis now includes an option to calculate a social cost for carbon. By adding the future, planetary harm inflicted by carbon as a monetary cost, a designer can evaluate and add the external economic impact to the individual product costs, Kneifel explained.

The software’s default values for all the considered environmental and economic factors come from reputable, third-party sources, such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). BEES relies on the Interagency Working Group’s (IWG) Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases for carbon costs. When IWG updates its findings, Kneifel’s team updates the software.…

GBA Prime

This article is only available to GBA Prime Members

Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.

Start Free Trial

0 Comments

Log in or become a member to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |