GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted
Musings of an Energy Nerd

Climate Activists React to ‘Don’t Look Up’

A Netflix satire ignites controversy

The two scientists in Don't Look Up are Kate Dibiasky, played by Jennifer Lawrence, and Randall Mindy, played by Leonardo DiCaprio. [Photo courtesy of Netflix]

For at least four decades, scientists have been warning political leaders that we are burning fossil fuels at a rate that will lead to a planetary catastrophe. In spite of these warnings, effective reductions in fossil fuel burning have not occurred, and the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased from about 335 ppm in 1980 to about 417 ppm in 2021.

It’s almost certainly too late to avoid planetary disaster—a fact which is especially agonizing for the scientists who have spent decades warning business and political leaders of the likely outcome of our current stupidity.

In my 2017 article, “Climate Change Challenges the Human Imagination,” I quoted author Jeff VanderMeer, who said, “The normal way of dealing with issues can’t be brought to bear on this issue [climate change]. … There is paralysis at the institutional level. … One thing fiction can do is make visible what is often invisible to us.”

One new example of the type of fiction that VanderMeer is talking about is the Netflix movie Don’t Look Up. Although the plot concerns the threat posed by an approaching comet, the movie is clearly an allegory about the threat of global climate change.

An aside about a graphic novel from 1942

Before discussing the movie in depth, I can’t resist a tangential comment concerning a classic 1942 comic book, the Tintin adventure called L’Étoile Mystérieuse. Translated into English as The Shooting Star, the graphic novel’s plot prefigures the calamity depicted in Don’t Look Up.

In the Tintin story, Professor Decimus Phostle (Hippolyte Calys in the French version) looks through his telescope and discovers a planetary object hurtling toward the earth. Professor Phostle is understandably alarmed at the impending catastrophe, but most of the people who hear his warnings don’t take them seriously.

GBA Prime

This article is only available to GBA Prime Members

Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.

Start Free Trial

5 Comments

  1. Expert Member
    Malcolm Taylor | | #1

    So long and thanks for all the fish.
    Douglas Adams.

    1. Jonny_H | | #2

      In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
      -also Douglas Adams

  2. KurtGranroth | | #3

    A recent study showed that people can be convinced of the climate change validity when given solid evidence... but that the effect only lasts for a very short time (no longer than a week) and the vast majority go back to believing what they did before.

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/impact-of-reading-about-climate-science-goes-away-almost-instantly/

    1. GBA Editor
      Martin Holladay | | #4

      "The biggest problem may be that the public has a very short memory." We're all getting early dementia...

      1. Expert Member
        Malcolm Taylor | | #5

        Early dementia that somehow interacts with our confirmation bias.

Log in or become a member to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |