GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Musings of an Energy Nerd

Raising the Bar for Energy Star Homes

The EPA Releases Details on More Stringent Specifications

At the ACI Home Performance conference in Kansas City, Sam Rashkin explained details of proposed changes to the specifications for Energy Star homes.
Image Credit: Alliance to Save Energy

Over a thousand home performance contractors, weatherization experts, HERS raters, and energy nerds are gathered in Kansas City, Missouri, this week to attend the ACI Home Performance conference (formerly known as the Affordable Comfort conference).

At one well-attended workshop, energy consultant Michael Blasnik and Shaun Hassel of Advanced Energy Corporation shared a roundup of data on the performance of Energy Star homes — data which are unlikely to be happily received at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Among the findings presented by Blasnik and Hassel:

“The Energy Star program started with a low bar,” noted Blasnik. “No one has found that Energy Star homes use 25% less energy than other homes.”

Explaining the findings, Hassel noted, “Baseline homes are not as bad as many models assume, and Energy Star homes are not as good as many models assume.”

More Mandatory Requirements

As codes have become more stringent, the Energy Star program has been struggling to play catch-up. In many states — most notably in California and Florida — Energy Star lost the battle for a while, slipping below minimum code.

At an evening workshop in Kansas City, Sam Rashkin, the national director of the EPA’s Energy Star Homes program, explained the details of the EPA’s latest proposal to raise the bar on requirements for Energy Star homes. Set to be released for public comment within a few days, the proposal is known as the 2011 Specification.

The highlights of the new requirements:

Of course, Energy Star’s proposed 2011 Specification is subject to change after the public comment period. Stay tuned.

GBA Prime

This article is only available to GBA Prime Members

Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.

Start Free Trial


  1. User avater
    John Semmelhack | | #1

    Links for Energy Star studies?

    Any chance you (or Blasnik/Hassel) can provide links to the studies referenced above? I'd love to dig into the details of the studies.

    Thanks for the summary of a proposed changes.


  2. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #2

    Here's a link
    I just got back from the conference, so I haven't had time to organize all of my materials. But here is a link to the Powerpoint slides that Michael Blasnik used for an earlier version of his presentation:

    This version does not include any reference to the Phoenix or Houston studies.

    Here's some information on the Phoenix study from a story in the October 2006 issue of Energy Design Update:

    PHOENIX, AZ -- A recent study shows that Energy Star homes in Phoenix use more energy than homes without an Energy Star label. Researchers conducting the Phoenix Home Energy Efficiency Study found that 3,336 homes categorized as “baseline” homes used an average of 14,107 kWh per year, while 2,979 Energy Star homes used an average 15,831 kWh per year, or 12% more energy. The reason: recently built Energy Star homes are, on average, larger than the studied “baseline” homes. The study, funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency, Arizona Public Service, and Southwest Gas, was conducted by Colby Swanson, an energy expert employed by Advanced Energy Corporation of Raleigh, North Carolina. According to “Measuring Public Benefit from Energy Efficient Homes,” the study’s final report, “It … appears that the increasing size of the average home, a trend the entire country is experiencing (and the subsequent increasing energy use), offsets to a large degree the savings achieved through improvements in home energy efficiency.”

    Eventually, the Powerpoint slides from Blasnik and Hassel's presentation should become available. I'll post the link when it shows up on the ACI Web site.

  3. User avater
    Paul Eldrenkamp | | #3

    Energy Star and 80% greenhouse gas reduction by 2050?
    Houses built this year will only be about 40 years old in 2050, the year by which the Obama administration would like us to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80%. In other words, houses built today will play a key role in our climate policy for the next several decades.

    If the EPA wanted to help make sure that the administration actually stood a chance of positioning the US to meet that 80% reduction goal, it would set the Energy Star standard at a HERS of 20 or so, and would structure the rebates to be at least partly based on actual performance rather than modeled performance.

    Just to be clear: I am not so naive as to think something like this would ever actually happen.

  4. Gall | | #4

    I would really like to
    I would really like to believe that there will be 80% greenhouse gas reduction by 2050 but I have my reasons to remain skeptical on this one. Although we should all know by now what to do to stop global warming there is still a large number of people that don't do anything about it. It's seems to be more difficult to fight ignorance than global warming. I recently replaced my appliances with new energy star and I don't plan to stop here, perhaps my new electricity bills will convince some of my neighbors to do the same.

Log in or become a member to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |