Seventh-day Adventists in Kinderhook, New York, have moved into their new church, likely to become the first church in the U.S. to be certified by the Passive House Institute U.S.
The 7,200-square-foot building includes a timber-framed sanctuary with an open ceiling and a wall of glass at one end. An attached wing houses classrooms, an area for toddlers, an office for Pastor Anton Kapusi, a fellowship hall, and a kitchen. After a building campaign that spanned a number of years, the congregation held its first services in the new building on May 7, even though finishing touches are still to come later this year.
“We love it,” Kapusi said by telephone. “Everybody is so excited. The first day we had the church packed — we had 250 people in there, and we had a nice crowd from the community. That was very encouraging for us.”
The congregation is a relatively new one, and it’s certainly no mega-church. It was started just 14 years ago by a few families in New York’s capital region, and now has some 90 regular attendees, Kapusi said. With guests, Saturday services may see between 80 and 120 people.
Their path to Passive House building wasn’t a straight line. Under its former pastor, the church had started to plan for a new church building, but at the time, the Passive House standard wasn’t part of the deal. Then, four years ago, the pastor died and Kapusi took his place. His European background and familiarity with Passivhaus construction, plus travels in Scandinavia by building committee chairwoman Maud Celestin, were among the factors that nudged the building committee toward a high-performance design.
The change would mean higher costs, and it posed its own challenges to BarlisWedlick Architects, which designed the project.
“The Kinderhook Church was perhaps the most challenging of our Passive House projects,” Marc Bailey, an associate at BarlisWedlick, said via email. “It was our first attempt applying the principles to a non-residential building and the first time they’ve been applied to a building of this type. There was no precedent.
“We were bringing all of our knowledge of building performance and design to a new and unique structure that we had initially designed to be built conventionally — the concept evolved as we collaborated further with the client,” he continued. “So, our approach was dictated by our initial design, but by making small changes to the building plan and elevations, and completely rethinking the building assembly and mechanical systems, we were able to not only meet but exceed the high performance threshold of the Passive House standard.”
Using money differently
Then it became a question of paying for it.
“We wondered how much is this going to hurt us,” Kapusi said. “In other words, what is the difference between the conventional and Passive House, and we were told it’s going to be more, obviously. They were saying something up to 20% more than the conventional building. It has been substantially more expensive, yes.”
The church had planned on spending about $1 million. Their builder, Don Hills of Hills Construction Management, Inc., said they should be thinking more in the range of $1.4 million to $1.6 million — and Hills had Passive House experience.
“We said, ‘No, no, no, that’s too far. We wouldn’t go further than $1.2 million,’ ” Kapusi recalled. “We didn’t want to get more mortgages, but we pretty much ended up at $1.7 [million].”
One reason for spending the extra money, he said, was the amount of money the church and two others in Kapusi’s three-church district were spending on energy. Another church in the district of about the same size could pay as much as $8,000 a year on energy. Taken together, the three churches were using a lot of money just to stay warm and keep the lights on.
“What really made us think seriously about this, when we put all these numbers down — we said, ‘Wait a second. If we go Passive House and save the money and direct this money into the community, we don’t need to ask anybody for it. It’s already there. We don’t need to raise that money, it’s already there. So why don’t we make a decision right now when we are starting to build something? The support was really overwhelming.”
The group’s belief they were acting as God’s stewards of planet Earth also was a factor because a Passivhaus building has a lighter environmental footprint than a conventional structure.
The high proportion of professionals in the congregation — university employees, physicians, and the like — were in a position to give generously to the building campaign, Kapusi said, and donations came in from around the country, sometimes from people neither Kapusi nor anyone else in the church actually knew.
“I don’t know how they they heard,” he said. “Power of the mouth, whatever it is. I mean, I don’t believe in that, OK. I believe in God’s providence, that He did something, who knows what. But my treasurer says, ‘Pastor, listen, I have no idea who this person is.’ And I ask, ‘Did you you ask anyone else?’ They have no idea who this person is who gave us $10,000.”
The church also got donations from local businesses. All the paint, for example, was a gift from a local retailer.
Choosing a SIP design
The building is constructed mainly with structural insulated panels (SIPs) manufactured by Vermont Timber Frames, the same company that fabricated the Douglas fir timber frame for the sanctuary.
Panels are 12 1/4 inches thick and insulated with Neopor, a type of graphite-enhanced expanded polystyrene made by BASF. Jeff Brooks, Vermont Timber Frame’s sales manager, said that Neopor has about 20% more R-value per inch than standard EPS insulation. The panels have an R-value of about 52.
The sanctuary is built completely with SIPs — cathedral ceiling and walls. At one end is a wall made mostly of glass, and that was a challenge, said Jordan Dentz, the Certified Passive House Consultant on the project and vice president of The Levy Partnership. The two-foot-thick wall needed steel bracing inside to handle wind and structural loads, but the steel posed condensation and thermal bridging issues. Designers used a combination of closed-cell polyurethane foam and blown in fiberglass insulation to seal and insulate it.
The attached wing has SIP walls of the same thickness as the sanctuary and a truss roof insulated with R-104 worth of blown-in fiberglass and closed-cell polyurethane foam, Hills said. Beneath the slab is a mix of Neopor and EPS insulation 14 inches thick.
Other building features include triple-pane Intus windows, electric point-of-use water heaters for the bathrooms and kitchen, and Mitsubishi ductless minisplits for heating and cooling.
Dentz said that the ventilation system, an UltimateAir energy-recovery ventilator, took some extra planning. Not all parts of the church would be used at any one time, so to avoid over-ventilation, the building was divided into a number of zones where air flow could be controlled with occupancy sensors.
In a blower-door test, the building registered 0.56 air changes per hour at a pressure difference of 50 pascals.
The building is listed as pre-certified at the PHIUS website. Dentz said that once the ventilation system has been commissioned, the final paperwork for certification will be submitted.
Get building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.