GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon

Community and Q&A

SIPs vs. traditional framing and exterior foam?

John Paul | Posted in Energy Efficiency and Durability on

I am not a builder, just a guy planning on building a home on some rural land I’ve purchased near Bowling Green, MO, zone 5.

Which is better, including cost considerations [I’m concerned I’m going to be able to find a builder in a rural area that wants to use green techniques] for a 1,760 sq ft main level, with a ~800 loft and walk out foundation 40×44 foot-print home:

SIPs or traditional?

Thanks

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. User avatar GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #1

    User-7203597,
    First of all, can you tell us your name? (I'm Martin.)

    Q. "Which is better?"

    A. SIP construction is faster but more expensive than conventional construction methods. It is not "better."

    In cold climates, SIP roofs can fail catastrophically due to rot caused by the moisture associated with exfiltratring air. To prevent this type of catastrophic failure, pay meticulous attention to air sealing details at SIP seams.

  2. John Paul | | #2

    Sorry about that, my first post.... my name is John

    Sounds like conventional construction might be a better route to go?

    The floor plan is about designed, allowing for conversations with potential contractors. I expect that most are going to be traditional method builders in rural MO.

    From all I've been reading, exterior foam insulation is the better method. Zone 5 calls for R-30 walls. Anybody have experience[s] in convincing 'old contractors new tricks'? How alien will it be if they've never done exterior insulation before? I may be just anticipating a problem that doesn't exist. Won't know until I start looking.

    Thanks

  3. AlexPoi | | #3

    Exterior foam is much better than sip panels in my opinion. In both cases, you rely on the foam to act as your air barrier (unless you put a membrane under the foam).

    With foam panels, you can have two layers of panels, overlap them and tape them to ensure a pretty good seal (bear in mind that foam can shrink, so it's important to use a good tape that won't tear out because of that shrinkage). You can't do that with SIP panels. Instead, you must seal all the seam with a special sealant and you must be very meticulous about it. Otherwise, you'll have condensation problems. It's take time to do a good job and it's not as robust as overlapping foam boards on top of your sheating.

  4. User avatar
    Peter Engle | | #4

    Success with SIPs requires attention to detail, and that may be difficult if the contractor does not have experience with them. Also, distance to a SIP manufacturer is an important cost and schedule consideration. You can get standard lumber anywhere.

  5. User avatar GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #5

    John,
    If you are just beginning to think about wall design, you probably want to read this article: "How to Design a Wall."

    1. John Paul | | #6

      Thanks!

      John

    2. John Paul | | #8

      Wow Martin,

      Read the recommended article... which lead to another and another.... :-)

      Lots of great info out there.

      In one of the articles [maybe more than one] it is stated that either exterior foam or Double Studs is acceptable. Also seem to remember that double stud was cited as being less expensive and more likely to be accepted by traditional builders.

      Is my simplistic summary accurate?

      Is there any reason to choose exterior foam over double wall construction?

      Thanks

  6. Brian P | | #7

    John,

    I'm not a builder or building expert, just a homeowner that was very involved in designing and building our energy efficient home in zone 6. Before you decide on a wall design, I'd suggest a couple things:

    Plans/Design - I'd run your house design, floor plan, and siting by someone knowledgeable with energy efficient home design. It's possible/likely there could be improvements with the design/siting that would have a major effect on energy efficiency.

    Builder - It's hard to find a good builder and even harder to find a good builder with experience building high performance homes. If you can't find the latter because of your location or budget, I'd focus on finding a good general builder and work with them on incorporating energy efficient features in the wall design, HVAC, etc. At least look into a builder that is involved with the Energy Star program.

    My impression from reading GBA for many years is that while exterior foam is a preferred wall design, many homeowners have a hard time finding a builder with that experience or a builder that can do it at a competitive rate. I'd absolutely keep that wall design on the table, but I'd also add in a double stud wall because the outer wall specs are going to be similar to a standard 2x6 wall.

    Brian

  7. User avatar GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #9

    John,
    Q. "Is there any reason to choose exterior foam over double wall construction?"

    A. A properly designed wall with exterior rigid foam will have exterior sheathing that stays dryer that the sheathing in a double-stud wall. That's an advantage -- although not necessarily enough of an advantage to tip the scales. Keep reading, and be prepared to make your own decisions.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |