GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Q&A Spotlight

How to Vent a Rainscreen

Should a rainscreen be integrated with soffit vents or vented only on the bottom?

Image 1 of 3
This rainscreen is vented at the top. A GBA reader wonders whether it's possible, or advisable, to connect the top of the rainscreen vent with the soffit vents.
Image Credit: Fine Homebuilding
This rainscreen is vented at the top. A GBA reader wonders whether it's possible, or advisable, to connect the top of the rainscreen vent with the soffit vents.
Image Credit: Fine Homebuilding
This photo shows how Peter Yost held down the top clapboard from the soffit. Screen protects the opening. The furring strips Yost used were 1/2 inch thick. (Photo: Peter Yost) This photo shows the “shadowboard” Yost used to conceal the shy clapboard and provide some resistance to wind-driven rain. (Photo: Peter Yost)

A vented rainscreen — an air gap behind the siding — has become a standard detail in many new houses. It helps remove moisture that works its way through the siding, and in the process helps siding last longer. It’s the “vented” part of this equation that has Gerald Pehl thinking.

“I’ve got an assembly design for a vented rainscreen, and it will be held continuous to the soffit spaces, which then vent through to the attic ridge vent via conventional vent chutes between the rafters,” Pehl says in a comment posted in the Q&A forum at GBA.

His question, and the start of this Q&A Spotlight, is whether this plan eliminates the need for additional soffit venting. Pehl’s building inspector has left the decision up to him.

Risks in the event of a fire

Malcolm Taylor suggests that connecting the rainscreen and attic ventilation might increase the drying potential of the wall assembly. He points out, however, that a rainscreen is typically 1/2 inch to 3/4 inch deep, a function of what material is used to create it, and that probably isn’t enough to make up the required area for soffit vents. Even if it did, he adds, that detail raises another issue: What happens in the event of a fire?

“Here in Canada,” Taylor writes, “we can’t connect the two to find out. The code precludes it because it creates a concealed air space from which fire can spread up into the roof assembly. Practically, I wonder how much difference there is from a fire spread point of view between a connected rainscreen, and one which is vented at the top with soffit vents immediately above. I’ll be interested to see what other posters think.”

GBA senior editor Martin Holladay notes fire safety is a question that’s been raised before (see, for example, “Can a rainscreen become a chimney for fire?” and “Fire-resistant rainscreen system”). “The issue of fire safety is contentious,” he says, “but in some areas of North America — areas where wildfires are common — vented rainscreens of any kind are controversial.”

He also notes that if the house has an effective ceiling air barrier, attic venting doesn’t matter much (see “All About Attic Venting”).

John Clark cites an article on this topic by Joseph Lstiburek of the Building Science Corporation. In it, he discusses the Grenfell Tower fire in London, exacerbated by rainscreen details that included a large air gap of 2 inches and a combustible outer skin. The bottom line is that air gaps don’t have to be all that big.

“We have addressed the gap many times before with respect to drainage,” Lstiburek wrote. “We want to control hydrostatic pressure and pretty much call it a day. We do not need much of a gap to control hydrostatic pressure…. a continuous 1/32 to 1/16 of an inch is all that you need.”

When the air gap is as big as it was in London, the fire implications are “huge,” but when the air gaps is small, less than 3/4 inch, “the friction from both surfaces bounding the air gap limits the air flow,” Lstiburek writes. “The boundary layer on both surfaces is an effective fire stop.”

In other words, in this assembly fire dangers are a non-issue.

Where the vents should be

According to Taylor, rainscreens that are vented at both the top and the bottom work better, although it’s not clear whether the top vent actually adds much in the way of performance.

“With one only vented at the bottom you get a capillary break, a drainage gap to handle bulk water intrusion, and some drying,” Taylor says. “Here in the wet Pacific Northwest almost all are only vented that way, and they perform very well. In a less damp climate, with a wall assembly that isn’t risky, venting at the top probably doesn’t bring huge benefits.”

Tyler Leclear Vachta cites research in British Columbia on the benefit of vented rainscreens, but he doesn’t necessarily see any added benefit to linking a rainscreen and attic ventilation.

“We most commonly see a small vent space just below the soffit, protected from wind-driven rain by a trim board and protected against insects by back wrapping the rainscreen fabric,” Vachta says. “There is certainly no benefit to your attic to have the two systems connected.”

The connection, Pehl replies, is a matter of convenience as well as appearance.

“The ideal case is to vent the rainscreen into the soffit because it’s the easiest assembly at this point in construction,” he says. “It also supports the aesthetics we want, although venting to the exterior at the top of the cladding as you describe might not even be a noticeable detail change.

“The real benefit to connecting the two systems is simplicity of the assembly, and the aesthetics of eliminating the venting channel in the soffit,” he continues. “To be clear, in the assembly that we are now considering, attic venting, for code and whatever benefit it does provide, is provided through from the bottom of the cladding, through a bug screen at the bottom of the 3/4-inch rainscreen channels, up to the soffit at the top, through the vent chutes into the attic, out the ridge vent at the top of the roof.”

Connecting rainscreen and attic may encourage mold

Taylor notes that while Building Science Corporation has made the point that a very small air gap is effective behind a rainscreen, “the reality of construction is that they may become closed due to the WRB [water-resistive barrier] intruding into them, or wood shrinkage over time.”

He also finds a couple of points worth repeating in the British Columbia study that Vachta has cited. First, a well-ventilated rainscreen works better than a poorly ventilated one. More important, the study “expressly suggests” that connecting the rainscreen to the attic is a lousy idea because of the moisture and mold problems that occur in buildings where this was done.

“Whether these problems are likely to occur outside the Pacific Northwest is still an open question,” Taylor writes. “Things happen in our climate that simply don’t elsewhere. The plywood roof sheathing in a well air-sealed and ventilated attic can grow mold, as can the cladding on the north side of houses. You may be building in more forgiving circumstances than we encounter here.”

Taylor’s remarks about the danger of a small rainscreen gap becoming blocked are well taken, Vachta says.

“Textured WRBs that create the smallest gap also have the least room for error,” he writes. “Rainscreen meshes also compress significantly, both impeding the drainage/ventilation gap and resulting in an uneven work surface. You want to be sure the rainscreen maintains a cavity during installation and the life of your building.”

The real risk to moisture-sensitive materials, he adds, is not from a one-time soaking, but from chronic exposure to small amounts of moisture.

“Drying with ventilation is the best way to address that,” he says. “One aspect of this [British Columbia] study that was unique is that it looked at the walls over a long period of time. There are a lot of studies and testing that just look at how walls perform under a single ASTM test where they have to drain 90% of the liquid moisture poured at the top of the assembly, or identify points where water under pressure comes spraying through the wall.

“But how long does it take the rest of that moisture to get out of the wall?” he continues. “Which layers get wet in the process? And what if the next moisture event happens before the wall dries?”

Are outdoor temperatures a factor?

Ambient temperatures may play a part in whether elevated moisture levels in walls lead to mold growth or rot, Vachta suggests. While a 15% wood moisture equivalent is perfect for fungal growth, he says, a WME of more than 20% is ideal for rot.

“During the cold winter months those thresholds aren’t as important because the freezing cold inhibits rot and fungus,” he says.

Low temperatures also remove moisture from the air, Pehl says, adding that “may be at least as important as the cold temperature in preventing mold/rot. I’ve been told that in the coldest months in Minnesota it’s as dry as the driest desert.”

“Yes, being a Minnesotan myself I can attest to the dry winter air!” Vachta says. “Cold air simply can’t hold as much moisture, true, but does that have a drying effect on the wood? Air/ temperature/ water move from high pressure/ temperature/ concentration to low pressure temperature/ concentration. The moisture in the wood runs the risk of condensing, or frosting. In a roundabout way, I suppose frosting (like freezer-burn) is drying.”

In Taylor’s neck of the woods, temperatures don’t get cold enough to offer that kind of winter protection from mold, but there’s no doubt that rainscreens have been a very significant improvement in building.

“Including rainscreens in our construction practices has transformed the resilience of walls here,” he says. “I simply don’t see the problems now that were endemic in any building I went to renovate in the past.”

Our expert’s opinion

Peter Yost, GBA’s technical director, added this:

Fire safety and vented rainscreens: The Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS) recommends the use of 1/8-inch mesh screening, robust enough to keep embers and brands from getting into any vented space on the building exterior. For more information, see “Top 10 Ways to Protect Your Property from Wildfire.”

On a residential project in Portola Valley, California — in a very wildfire-prone area — we vented the rainscreen cladding top and bottom using not only 1/8-inch mesh but also an intumescent paint (painted onto the wire mesh) that would foam and close off the top and bottom openings of the rainscreen when activated by high heat (that is, in the event of a wildfire). We developed this approach based on conversations and advice from Steve Quarles, a leading wildfire expert who is now Chief Scientist for Wildfire and Durabilty at the IBHS Research Center.

Closing off the top of a vented rainscreen wall assembly: I have seen projects taking this approach with the paint peeling off the top course or two of lapped siding because warm, moisture-laden and buoyant air is “stacking up” in the closed-off vented area. (Some folks call it a “vented” assembly when the top is closed and a “ventilated” assembly when top and bottom are open, with the former not supporting convective drying while the latter does.) Whether you close the top to prevent moisture from getting in (wind-driven rain) or open it to let moisture out (solar-driven heating of cladding in hot-humid conditions) may be based on your own experience, climate, and site conditions.

And yes, the depth of the vented space does make a difference. In British Columbia, codes mandate a 10 millimeter (about 3/8-inch) space between the cladding and the rest of the wall, choosing this as a minimum depth to promote 100% free drainage and air movement.

Rainscreen products like HydroGap that create a 1-mm gap between the cladding and the rest of the wall pass the ASTIM drainage test minimum of 90% free drainage. That said, the manufacturer of HydroGap readily admits that a 1-mm gap, regardless of whether it is open on the top and bottom, does not support convective air movement.

Connecting ventilated wall claddings to soffit-to-ridge venting: I don’t believe that any U.S. code addresses this issue but plenty of building code inspectors will have their own perspective or position. I have asked Joe Lstiburek about this, as well as asked a bunch of builders who take this approach, and have not heard any negative reports, if you limit this connection to the movement of outside air and not any air leaking at eaves. In other words, with a continuous air barrier at the eaves, connecting wall and roof venting just gives you a taller, longer column of warm air, and hence more stack effect to drive air movement.

For a look at how I handled the rainscreen on my own home, see Images #2 and #3 below.


  1. Jeff Stetter | | #1

    Vented Cavity Depth
    One aspect of the cavity depth discussion that often seems overlooked is the necessary depth of solid wood that is required for attachment of a variety of common siding materials. This is specific to when furring is being placed over rigid insulation and not directly over structural sheathing. Many siding materials require 1" embedment of fasteners at 16" o.c.. This also often precludes advanced framing techniques of 24"oc framing as well as the more shallow cavity depth. In summary, if you want a siding warranty, 5/4x wood furring is often required for proper siding attachment thus providing a 1" vented cavity.

    1. Richard Stern | | #14

      I would also be interested to hear comments on the experience of using different types of siding attached to furring strips at 16" o.c. (or other). It seems obvious that stiffer siding is desirable so that the unsupported spans don't flex or be prone to bending with the occasional side loading. Are siding manufacturers who previously assumed attachment directly to sheathing now offering products specifically for the vented cavity installation? Aluminum better than vinyl? Composites even better in this aspect?

      1. Malcolm Taylor | | #15


        I'm not aware of any manufacturer that has altered their products for installation on rain-screen furring, or of any problems using vinyl, or the various composites. Most have altered their installation guides to include mounting on furring, with the only noticeable possible impediment being the depth of solid material need to provide purchase for fasteners.

      2. Brendan Albano | | #16

        Many manufacturers have a special brochure or instruction manual for installing their products on furring strips.

        For example, here are James Hardie's instructions:

        At this point, a manufacturer who doesn't offer clear instructions for installing their products on battens over a rainscreen gap seems like they are falling behind the times.

        1. Richard Stern | | #17

          Many thanks for the feedback and link to installation instructions. I'm in Edmonton and could not find any supplier of perforated J channel, but finally found Coravent SV-5 at Convoy Supply.

  2. Jeff Stetter | | #2

    Diagram doesn't seem to make sense.
    I also notice that the "Rainscreen Vented at Top" doesn't really make any sense. Doesn't the horizontal 1x3 at the top, block any ventilation from happening since the screen is basically wrapping the 1x3?

  3. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #3

    Response to Jeff Stetter
    The siding is fastened to the furring strips. The horizontal 1x3 at the top of the wall is nailed on the exterior side of the furring strips -- not in the same plane, but proud of the furring strips. This horizontal 1x3 brings the horizontal frieze board to a plane that is well proud of the siding -- the horizontal 1x3 packs out the frieze board. The result is a gap between the bottom of the frieze board (probably a 5/4x4 or a 5/4x6) and the siding. This gap is the vent for the top of the rainscreen cavity.

  4. Scott Paulson | | #4

    Ice damming concerns
    My concern for venting into the soffit would be in a cold snowy climate. I think there is a potential issue for the wall acting as a solar air heater and then sending all that air directly to the underside of the roof. Thus starting a cycle of snow melt and freezing that could lead to ice damming.

    I would say this is even a concern with having the soffit intake vent near the wall rain-screen vent if they were separated. I always suggest moving the soffit vent as far away from the wall as possible.

    I would be interested to here others opinions.

  5. User avater
    Jon R | | #5

    Even greater separation from
    Even greater separation from wall heat would be achieved with vents under the eave shingles (eg, SmartVent) and none in the soffit. This also allows extending some insulation into the overhangs.

  6. Trevor Lambert | | #6

    rain screen direct to the attic
    I am building a house with a 1.5" rain screen, clad with Hardie Panel (the 4x10 sheets, not lap siding). Before reading this article, I was actually considering having the soffit abut on the siding such that the rain screen basically connects directly to the attic space. I gather this is a stupid idea? I'm in southwest Ontario, moderately cold winters, humid summers but not particularly rainy.

  7. Malcolm Taylor | | #7

    Our code here in BC has a section devoted to rain screens which prohibits connecting the two. I don't know if the Ontario code has adopted the same standards. You need to look at the requirements for fire-stops between assemblies in concealed spaces to see if it is allowed.

  8. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #8

    Response to Trevor Lambert (Comment #6)
    Q. "I was actually considering having the soffit abut on the siding such that the rainscreen basically connects directly to the attic space. I gather this is a stupid idea?"

    A. The point of this article is to discuss the pros and cons of the approach you mention. GBA readers can consider the arguments of the experts interviewed for the article and can draw their own conclusions.

    Personally, I think it makes more sense to vent the rainscreen gap at the top of the wall rather than direct the air into the soffit or the attic. But I think that in the vast majority of cases, connecting the rainscreen gap to the attic doesn't cause any problems.

  9. Andrew Bater | | #9

    Lstiburek Ice Dam Warning - Snow Prone Regions
    Joe Lstiburek's advice on solar radiation with dark claddings altered the construction methodology in our home. (Figure 9 in the link that Jon R. posted.) Like Trevor above, we knew we were going to utilize Hardie panels with a rain screen assembly.

    It's a passive solar SIP home and our original plan was to truncate the roof SIPs at the wall edges. Soffit vents in field built overhangs would have then ventilated the cold roof. Joe's advice changed that direction.

    Our wall assembly was built with Cor-A-Vent strips beneath the Hardie panels. Those strips were placed at the future batten locations so as to minimize nail marks. Cor-A-Vent top and bottom provide air flow. (In hindsight I do like the screen detail as shown at the top of this article somewhat better than what we did. It provides less hidden surface area for boring insects to get into the blocking behind the top frieze board.)

    Our roof SIPs extend past the wall edges to the gutter line. Our cold roof above was ventilated at fascia edge, more Cor-A-Vent.

    Under the category of "it's anecdotal data", here are some south wall temp pictures I captured midday yesterday. It was 82 degrees outside. (They display here bottom to top.)

  10. E247 | | #10

    Sorry to comment on an old
    Sorry to comment on an old article, but I have a question that doesn't seem to be addressed by the article. What about venting the rainscreen into the eave if the attic is unvented? There are vents in the soffit but the attic is sealed. Would there be a problem venting the rainscreen into the soffit in this application?

  11. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #11

    Response to E247
    An unvented attic is like an upside-down wine bottle. If you connect something to the mouth of an upside-down wine bottle, it isn't vented. It's sealed at the top.

    If you want the advantages of top-side venting -- namely, air flow and ventilation drying -- you need to vent to the exterior, not to an unvented attic.

  12. E247 | | #12

    I understand that the attic
    I understand that the attic is unvented. I was only asking if the vents in the soffit could be used at the top vent for the wall's rainscreen.

    For example, if the roof assembly was similar to the picture below where the attic is unvented. If soffit vents were installed and the rainscreen for the wall was vented into the soffit, would there be any issues (so air could enter the bottom of the wall assembly, go into the eave and then exit through the vents in the soffit)

  13. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #13

    Response to E247
    As long as local codes permit, there is no reason that your rainscreen gap couldn't be vented into the soffit area.

    If the soffit is ventilated -- that is, if your soffit material allows air flow -- the air movement through the rainscreen gap would be possible with this approach.

  14. Richard Stern | | #18

    It would be nice if someone point me to section details (that I can't seem to find again in GBA, I've seen it somewhere) of the bottom of the rainscreen assembly with best practices for integrating the WRB, exterior mineral insulation, furring strips, and drip edge above foundation. My question here may already be answered in that discussion as to whether or not a drip edge metal flashing should be shingled in with the WRB, or be placed on top of the furring strips and be a drip edge for the cladding. My initial thought was that the former would conceal the bottom edge of the whole assembly (which includes Cor-A-Vent between furring strips), and channel any water originating from either WRB or rainscreen cavity.

  15. Hugh Weisman | | #19

    My project on Martha's Vineyard will have two wide sliding door assemblies on the first floor, one 16' wide, the other 12. The height of the rain screen below the doors is only 12". For a variety of detailing issues, I'm finding it difficult to provide a vent gap at the top of this portion of the rainscreeen. From reading this discussion, it sound's like, given the short height of the affected portion of the rainscreen, omitting top venting below the door sill will have a negligible effect on performance. Am I correct?

    1. Malcolm Taylor | | #20


      All residential buildings here in Coastal BC have to include rain-screens. Very few are top-vented, and in what is a quite demanding climate, they seem to work fine without it.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.


Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |