GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

CLT vs SIP exterior wall construction

CASUDI | Posted in Green Building Techniques on

Pacific northwest, 4C climate zone. (asking for a friend)

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. Expert Member
    Akos | | #1

    About the only reason for either one is for speed of construction. Neither option is cost effective compared to standard stick built.

    There is a benefit for CLT for sound especially when it comes to multifamily units.

    There is a good thread about a CLT build on the site:

    https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/wolfe-island-passive-building-with-cross-laminated-timber

  2. Expert Member
    RICHARD EVANS | | #2

    Yikes.

    Is there a third option?

  3. creativedestruction | | #3

    One has integral continuous foam insulation. The other looks nice, and requires continuous exterior insulation.

    What are your [friend's] project goals?

  4. Expert Member
    Michael Maines | | #4

    CLT can sequester carbon and can cost-effectively replace concrete and steel on mid-rise projects. It can be used for single-family homes but it's not common, or cost-effective except perhaps for some very unusual projects.

    SIPs have relatively high embodied carbon, are vulnerable to various construction errors and a house built with SIPs probably won't last more than a few decades without major repairs. But they install quickly.

  5. burninate | | #5

    Just to deal with one particular misapprehension you may or may not be harboring:

    The R-value of CLT is about 1.25 per inch. Washington State requires a wall R-value of R-21. So if you're relying PURELY on CLT for insulation, as some of the proponents declare is feasible, you're looking at 16 inches (40cm) thickness of solid glued-together wood. I can barely find any cost estimates for CLT, but what I can find indicates that $1000 per cubic meter is a reasonable ballpark estimate. That means you'd be paying about $250 per square meter, or $23 per square foot.

    This is much, much higher than you would pay for a cavity wall of any type, or for SIPS, or for ICFs, or for a sane CLT assembly featuring 4"-6" thick panels and some other form of insulation.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |