GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Picture icon Hamburger Icon Close Icon Sorted

Community and Q&A

Insulation choices

user-483478 | Posted in Energy Efficiency and Durability on

Hi I am building a house in Michigan zone 5 and am deciding on either 2×4 walls 16″ oc with r13+5 or 2×6 walls 24 oc with r-23 mineral wool. Does the extra r value with the 2×6 wall make up for not having a continuous thermal break. Pricing wise they end up pretty close.  If the 2×6 wall has the same performance as r-13+5 I would go that route to save time installing exterior foam.  What are your thoughts. Thanks

GBA Prime

Join the leading community of building science experts

Become a GBA Prime member and get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

Replies

  1. user-1116814560 | | #1

    A simplistic calculation would be-if my math is correct-studs are r=1.25/in wood-at the studs 2x6 inch wall has 5.5x 1.25= 6.8, the four inch wall has 3.5x1.25=4.48, plus 5=9.48, but in a 24in oc wall studs are only ( 2.5/24=10.4 per cent of wall, whereas 16 ioc is 2.5/16=15.65%

    2x6 wall 24 ioc sans ext insulation effective wall r value then is 6.8 x 0.104 =0.7 +23 x 0.896= 20.6;meffective r=21.3
    2x4 wall is 9.48x0.156=1.47 + 13 x 0.944=12.27or effective wall r of 13.53

    Ceteris parabis ie similar sheathing well sealed which would add say 7/16x 1.25=0.54 trivial and to both anyway
    Also assume you will be same foundation dimensions and cantilevering the 2x6 _if not you either lose 8inches inside the house dimensionally !
    Am assuming rock wool friction fit batts OR dense pack cellulose on so no sagging /ain’t voids even on the 24 ioc wall-

    If I’ve done the math right from pure r value 2x6 without ext seems compelling choice, however these are average wall value- the 2x6 wall varies between 7-23, whereas the 2x4 with ext sheathing has less variability-r 9.3- 18 ;a range from also have to perhaps consider how how bad is risk of condensation on that 2.6 stud inside-ie is humidity rel high at any time fo year? Vapor barrier inside ?climate- I’d reckon most will vote for the wall without ext sheathing. And what about costs ? A 10 foot 2x4 stud runs , $5, a 2x6 $6; a strip of r23 mineral wool 2x10 would be $3 @15 cents sq inch, when add in cost of foam
    You are using 33% more lumber in the 2x4 wall, and the price of stud is only 20 per cent less AND you have to add the cost of the foam.

  2. user-5946022 | | #2

    Consider another alternative:
    2x6 top & bottom plates, with 2x4's at 12" oc alternating every other one flush to outside/inside.
    This gives you a complete thermal break between the top & bottom plates, and gives you the 6" of insulation. I found to be the same cost as 2x6 @24" oc because although it is slightly more board feet of lumber, the cost of 2x4's in my area is so much less per/bf than the cost of 2x6's, so the material cost was less. The upcharge in the labor was about equal to the material savings.

Log in or create an account to post an answer.

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |