GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Guest Blogs

Are Energy-Saving Settings Bad for the Environment?

‘Eco modes’ ostensibly reduce environmental impact, but only if people use them

The “econ” button on this car's console reduces fuel consumption — but only when the driver isn't deterred by lowered performance.
Image Credit: Scott Gibson


Volkswagen’s deceptive engine controls, uncovered last year, gave its cars a dual personality: one for everyday operation and a secret greener one used to rank higher than warranted on vehicle emissions tests. Regulators in the U.S. and Europe are now examining whether some television manufacturers similarly misbehaved, programming their screens to detect a standard video test clip, dial down their brightness and thus cheat on energy consumption tests.

While action deliberately aimed at providing deceptively favorable information about environmental impacts could obviously make a person cynical about a company’s claims, efficiency advocates see similar risk hiding in the open in the “eco” buttons popping up on a wide array of products, from automobiles and TVs to dishwashers and water heaters.

The multiple energy personalities in today’s devices present complex, ill-defined, and often confusing options for consumers and regulators to consider. “It’s not simply on and off anymore,” says Noah Horowitz, who runs the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Center for Energy Efficiency.

While eco buttons and modes allow consumers to set their devices for lower power consumption, in many cases they also degrade the quality of service the products provide. As a result, eco buttons, which can promise savings of 10% or more when they’re deployed, may have little real impact on energy consumption. “It’s good for selling a product to offer an eco mode,” says Rainer Stamminger, an energy expert at the University of Bonn in Germany. “But in reality I fear they’re not often used.”

And much as the cheat devices made VW car buyers think the product they were purchasing was more environmentally friendly than it really was in actual use, consumers may be misled when eco buttons and modes enable manufacturers to score top marks in government-mandated energy labeling programs. “You may not see the energy savings that you were expecting to see because the tests are done in conditions that don’t reflect reality,” says Christoforos Spiliotopoulos, an energy policy officer with Brussels-based product standards advocacy group ECOS.

Eco-button loophole

I got my first glimpse of what Spiliotopoulous and his colleagues call the “eco-button loophole” two years ago when I set up a new TV emblazoned with the logo for Energy Star, a mark of excellence maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In fact, the preset energy-saving mode that had earned my TV its Energy Star credential delivered a drearily dim picture. Its efficiency promise went out the window as I set the TV to another preset mode called “Movie” that uses about 10% more power.

It turns out that my experience is widely shared. Consumer Reports noted in 2014 that many TVs qualify for Energy Star by employing a power-saving mode that “can result in a dim or washed-out picture.” The magazine endorsed my solution, suggesting the switch to “Movie” mode for “a natural-looking picture.” concurred last September, advising readers to dump the “ridiculously dim Standard mode” created for Energy Star.

Katharine Kaplan, who leads the EPA team that develops Energy Star’s specifications, says that is worrying feedback, since one of her program’s founding tenets is that certified products should deliver as good or better all-around performance than the competition. Kaplan says that the EPA has responded, adjusting its TV specifications twice in the past three years to protect against manufacturers using dim settings to win efficiency ratings. The EPA’s October 2015 update defines, for the first time, an absolute minimum brightness for standard home viewing.

Drivers and dryers

Eco-mode performance degradation is a turnoff in other products as well. Consider automobiles, where an increasing array of models come equipped with a console button promising fuel savings by dampening vehicle acceleration.

Jack Barkenbus, a political scientist at Vanderbilt University’s Climate Change Research Network, admits to seldom pressing the eco button in his Nissan Leaf: Motoring with the button pressed, he says, is akin to “trying to drive through molasses.” He suspects that, as with my TV experience, he is not the only one forgoing an eco option’s promised energy savings.

“If the eco label comes with a trade-off in performance, the public isn’t buying,” Barkenbus says.

The good news with eco buttons in cars is that no one is being misled. EPA rules require buttons-off operation when testing cars’ fuel economy. And if people do press cars’ eco buttons, they really can save fuel.

That wasn’t the case with clothes dryers, according to 2011 tests by the NRDC: they discovered two dryers’ eco modes left clothes damp, requiring a second run through, which negated any energy savings.

Consumer distrust

Such disappointing experiences breed consumer distrust, with sometimes ironic outcomes. Consider Europe’s efforts to make dishwashers more efficient. The European Commission’s Ecodesign program mandates that each dishwasher offer a “reference” cycle that cleans an average load of dishes with minimum energy and water use. But a sudsy debate has erupted since 2011, when European standards body CENELEC instructed manufacturers to name that official reference cycle “Eco” on their dishwasher control panels.

The problem, say consumer groups, is that users may distrust the label and choose another cycle.

Defending dishwashers’ regulated eco button is Milena Presutto, the senior researcher at Italian energy research agency ENEA who drafted Europe’s legislation covering dishwashers. She says that while eco modes of the past could not always handle normally soiled dishes, today’s standards assure consumers that pressing the eco button will clean everyday dishes with the efficiency promised on the machines’ energy labels. “That’s the issue we wanted to solve,” says Presutto.

The problem, say consumer groups, is that users may distrust the label and choose another cycle. Their concern is supported by a large market study by Stamminger and his colleagues published this year — one of the few to date examining how consumers relate to eco modes. The survey of dishwasher use in several thousand German households found that most shy away from eco cycles. “They are used for less than 20% of dishwashing cycles,” says Stamminger.

The net result could be that European dishwashers are using more energy than necessary, since manufacturers focus their engineering efforts on perfecting the legally mandated reference cycle.

Topten International Group, a Zürich-based consumer product rating and advocacy organization proposed a solution: test and regulate dishwashers based on a cycle labeled “Normal” or “Standard,” rather than what Topten calls “the rather exotic eco cycle.”

Stamminger suggests another solution: better education. He is calling on European governments to back up the Ecodesign program with advertising that encourages consumers to press the eco button. “Eco mode is not sufficient if it’s not used,” he says. “What is needed is to standardize the eco mode and have a big public campaign as well.”

Worth saving

NRDC’s Horowitz says eco modes that actually reduce energy use are worth saving, even when they trade a bit of convenience for enhanced energy efficiency. The same eco button that takes the fun out of driving for some, or renders a TV lifeless for me, may be just fine to others. Sometimes, he says, it’s simply a matter of context. An eco cycle on a clothes dryer that runs for two hours at low temperature to save kilowatts may be a nonstarter if one is running multiple laundry loads to keep a family clean, but it could work great for a single load. “If you’re going out to a movie, you don’t care [if the laundry’s done quickly] and you should have the option to save energy,” Horowitz says.

Household energy consumption already is beginning to decline in many countries, thanks to better insulation and more efficient appliances. Eco modes, says Horowitz, can help accelerate that. “We can drive that trend even further if we take proper advantage of these settings and capabilities,” says Horowitz.

For the responsible consumer, this means giving those eco buttons a fair try, when they are available, to see if the results fit your expectations. You can even do a few measurements to see how much energy is at stake. (I checked the impact of mode switching on my TV by plugging it into an easy-to-use device called the Kill A Watt meter.)

And what if the eco buttons come up short? Think about letting the world know about it. One of the biggest challenges facing rating programs such as EPA’s Energy Star, academic researchers and consumer advocates alike is a dearth of feedback on how consumers actually use products. Those efficiency wonks are dying to hear from you.

Peter Fairley is an independent reporter based in British Columbia who covers energy and the environment. This post originally appeared at Ensia.


  1. John Clark | | #1

    So many issues
    If performance wasn't so poor then there would not be a need for an "eco mode" button, but hey regulators don't mind if companies spend $$ and time just to meet a gov't mandated specification regardless of whether or not that specification works.

    Exhibit A: Front loading clothes washers

    For the record my vehicle has an "eco mode" button and I hardly ever use it because the mode includes cycling the compressor on the A/C. The cycling doesn't remove humidity so the cabin becomes uncomfortable.

  2. Joe Dwyer | | #2

    Some ECO Buttons Add Value
    Obviously the product needs to work as intended or the button is worthless. The article highlights some silly applications of the ECO button like TV back lighting, clothes dryers not functioning, etc.

    Some ECO buttons work just fine for many users. Take the ECO button of the Nissan Leaf, that limits the throttle response of the pedal, as one example. This is very useful to prevent unnecessary acceleration and also to allow easier control of coasting (zero power) without shifting into neutral while driving. If you're constantly accelerating to get ahead of others on the freeway or on-ramps, then maybe ECO isn't appropriate. The same goes for the B shift setting to maximize brake regeneration, which is great for city use but not so great on the freeway. We mostly drive our Leaf in the city environment and greatly surpass EPA "fuel" economy estimates by careful driving and using such setting.

    I would like to see ECO buttons for heating and cooling devices, like split air source heat pumps. Although more complicated than most consumer devices, allowing settings to be simplified could greatly reduce energy use (aux mode, defrost mode, etc.). I still had to go into "hidden" HVAC tech settings to help my neighbor lock out aux strip heat to a lower outdoor temperature on a 2014 model ASHP. It's the same as our 2001 model, but has the fancy touch screen and Wi-Fi thermostat with relatively limited options that aren't hidden.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |