GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Musings of an Energy Nerd

Who Can Perform My Load Calculations?

Most HVAC contractors don’t know how to do heating load and cooling load calculations — so what’s a homeowner to do?

Using a rule of thumb to size heating and cooling equipment almost always results in oversized equipment. It's best to calculate heating and cooling loads with Manual J.
Image Credit: Martin Holladay

To design a residential heating or cooling system, the first step is to perform a load calculation. (A load calculation determines the size of a building’s heating load on one of the coldest nights of the year and the size of a building’s cooling load on one of the hottest afternoons of the year.) It’s important to know the size of these loads to determine the size of the required heating and cooling equipment.

The best way to determine residential heating and cooling loads is with Manual J, a load calculation method developed by the Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA). Manual J calculations are made with a Manual J software program — for example, Adtek AccuLoads, Cool Calc, Elite RHVAC, EnergyGauge, or Wrightsoft RightSuite Universal.

Manual J software doesn’t just provide the heating and cooling load for the entire house; it provides the heating and cooling load of each room in the house. Room-by-room calculations are required, because without them, it’s impossible to design a home’s heating and cooling distribution system (ducts in the case of cooling, and either hydronic tubing or ducts in the case of heating).

Accurate load calculations aren’t just a good idea; they are required by most building codes. In the 2012 IRC, the requirement can be found in Section M1401.3: “Heating and cooling equipment and appliances shall be sized in accordance with ACCA Manual S based on building loads calculated in accordance with ACCA Manual J or other approved heating and cooling calculation methodologies.”

Even though contractors are supposed to show a local code official proof that a load calculation was performed, enforcement of this requirement is spotty. When Allison Bailes was in Aspen, Colorado, a local official mentioned a conversation he had had with other Colorado code officials…

GBA Prime

This article is only available to GBA Prime Members

Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.

Start Free Trial


  1. User avater
    Armando Cobo | | #1

    Great start, but its not that simple!
    The code, building officials and the building industry have created a world where “all you have to do is perform a Manual J and everything will be alright”. Those of us who live in the real world know that we must perform Manuals J, D, S and T. A Manual J without ALL the other calculations mean NOTHING! Manual J is just the start… and yes, not only most building officials don’t know what to look for in a MJ8, but neither the big majority of the design and building community.
    Also let’s be fair, I work with an HVAC contractor who does things right for my clients because he trusts my designs and the builders I work with. He knows that we require and perform 1ACH50, HERS40s in our houses, with systems inside the conditioned space and all metal ducts. He tells me he can’t do the same work with most of his builder clients because they don’t have the same performance standards.
    To me it all starts with commitments from the homeowner, the builder and his subs, and the design community. I have chosen not to design houses that doesn’t meet my minimum efficiency standards. I have chosen not to work with homeowners and builders not committed to build same houses. I’ve chosen not to work with any subcontractor (HERS rater, Framer, Insulator, HVAC, etc.) that is not committed to do the work it needs to be done right. It’s just that simple… no fuss, no mess, no arguing and no headaches.
    The bottom line, it’s a very complex problem, but if tackled correctly up front, the rest is easy.

  2. Michael Brackett | | #2

    online calculator
    I am currently dealing with this. I am giving a try. It is $39 and hopefully will be helpful. All the HVAC contractors are giving me calculations that are about 3 times what we need.

  3. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #3

    Response to Michael Brackett
    From the information provided on the sample print-out, the inputs look simplified. It doesn't look like you can input the window SHGC or glazing U-factor.

    It also appears that air leakage rate inputs are vague, with terms like "tightness is average."

    -- Martin Holladay

  4. Michael Brackett | | #4

    Response to Martin
    I think there is a place to input the window manufacturer's U-factor and SHGC, but I'm not sure that you can individually for different windows in the house. I haven't had much time to work on it lately but I will try to learn more about it. Also, it does have a place to input your blower door test results.

  5. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #5

    Response to Michael Brackett
    I'm glad to hear that my hunches were wrong.

    -- Martin Holladay

  6. User avater
    Leigha Dickens | | #6

    make the effort to share the specs
    As a homeowner or builder, if you do find a willing HVAC contractor, take the time to actually provide him or her with detailed envelope specs, and make sure that information is accurate (and like, actually figured out ahead of time) and not going to change wildly from design to reality! It seems obvious, but I definitely have seen this *not* happen. In a perfect world the HVAC contractor would ask about and pay attention the envelope design and not just make assumptions, but so should the builder or homeowner go ahead and make sure the envelope info is available and clear and final. For builders over time this can build trust and understanding between you and an HVAC contractor who is willing to do it right, with better buildings as a result.

    I suspect a HERS rater or mechanical engineer is probably more likely to prompt a homeowner or builder to provide missing envelope specs or help those who haven't figured out some key aspect of the envelope that affects load calcs to get that figured out, rather than just make an assumption, as is probably more likely to suggest a wise course for said missing envelope spec, so for that reason alone one of those professionals may be worth the money. I would definitely agree to ask the HVAC contractor if they're ok with using a third party's calculations...I have run into those who aren't. (Or maybe it was just my approach that turned him off. Turns out "I know a lot about this trust me do what I say" isn't the most diplomatic way to go...who knew?) Good relationships require effort to build. The one with the HVAC contractor is a really important one.

  7. Jaccen | | #7

    Michael Brackett,

    How did you find using the ? Any comments or a mini-review? Looking at the website, I noticed it only seemed to allow up to R-55 which, for us in Ontario, doesn't meet code (OBC) when spec'ing the attic insulation.
    p.34 shows how attics in Ontario now require nominal R-60 insulation.

    Let alone address those who super-insulate around R-80 to R-100.

    Other than that, the software looks like it's "good enough" and I'd appreciate your comments on it. Thanks.

    Side note: is there a way to PM members after the website upgrade?

  8. User avater GBA Editor
    Martin Holladay | | #8

    Q. "Is there a way to PM members after the website upgrade?"

    A. Unfortunately, no. In some cases, I can contact a GBA reader by email and let them know that another GBA reader is interested in contacting them. In this case, I have no access to Michael Brackett's email address (although I may be able to contact Michael -- I'm investigating a work-around).

  9. Jaccen | | #9

    Thanks Martin. I appreciate the effort. Cheers.

Log in or become a member to post a comment.



Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |