green-building-newsheader image
0 Helpful?

Congress Urged to Save Energy Star Program

In a letter to Congressional leaders, U.S. companies say the 'highly successful' program has saved consumers billions of dollars in utility bills

Posted on Apr 28 2017 by Scott Gibson

More than 1,000 U.S. businesses and organizations have signed a letter to Congressional leaders urging that they oppose the Trump administration's plan to withdraw federal funding for the Environmental Protection Agency's Energy StarLabeling system sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Energy for labeling the most energy-efficient products on the market; applies to a wide range of products, from computers and office equipment to refrigerators and air conditioners. program.

The Associated Press reports that major manufacturers such as United Technologies, Ingersoll Rand, and Staples affirmed that Congress should strengthen the program, not weaken it, and that Energy Star has been a successful collaboration between public and private interests. In all, 1,050 businesses and organizations signed the letter.

Energy Star is a voluntary program launched in 1992 designed to encourage energy efficiency in a wide range of consumer products. The program has saved an estimated $430 billion in utility bills in the last 25 years. The EPA says that 85% of the American public recognizes the Energy Star label as a sign of efficiency.

The move to drop the $50 million in annual program costs from the federal budget is part of the Trump administration's plan to reduce spending at the EPA from $8.3 billion to $5.7 billion a year, a 31% cut. Programs on efficiency and climate change would be especially hard hit.

But many U.S. business leaders say that the plan to defund Energy Star is misguided, says Kateri Callahan, president of the Alliance to Save Energy, an advocacy group that organized the business letter.

"I don’t know who recommended shutting down this program to the president, but I can assure you it was bad advice that would hurt American businesses, consumers, and our overall economy,” Callahan said.

The full text of the letter, sent to congressional leaders on April 24, can be found here.


Image Credits:

  1. Andy Melton / CC BY-SA 2.0 / Flickr

Apr 28, 2017 11:46 AM ET

Speculation that it's about personal financial benefit
by Dana Dorsett

CNN tweets & L.A. Times articles point out that there is an upside for the president's private business interest in making Energy Star go away:

The conflict of interest is real enough, but it's hard to buy into that as a primary motivator. Still it's hard to buy into lots of things regarding this administration, some demonstrably proven, others still speculative.

Register for a free account and join the conversation

Get a free account and join the conversation!
Become a GBA PRO!