Avoiding the Global Warming Potential of Mini-Splits?
There has been much discussion previously on the surprising global warming potential (GWP) of extruded polystyrene (XPS), at 1430. According to Wikipedia--so it must be true--the refrigerant R410A has a GWP of 1725. R410A is commonly used in heat pumps. Unintended consequences?
Asked by TJ Elder
Posted Sun, 01/29/2012 - 19:18
Posted Sun, 01/29/2012 - 19:18
Yahoo
Technorati
Google
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
RedditOther Questions in Green products and materials
In Building Code Questions | Asked by michael maines | May 23, 12
In Energy efficiency and durability | Asked by Victor Burgos | May 23, 12
In Energy efficiency and durability | Asked by David Slade | May 21, 12
In General questions | Asked by Robert Hronek | May 23, 12
In General questions | Asked by Holger Herrmann | May 23, 12
This is an interesting question and I'd love to know more. If I understand correctly, the GWP of XPS is associated with the blowing agents used and released to the atmosphere during manufacture, whereas that of R410A is if the refrigerant is allowed to escape to the atmosphere after or during use and can be avoided if the material is properly contained and recycled. There's also the question of relative volumes, or more correctly masses, of the respective gases associated with typical construction situations.
Posted Sun, 01/29/2012 - 20:28
T.J.
My understanding is that it is illegal in the U.S. to allow these refrigerants to be released to the atmosphere. HVAC contractors are supposed to be trained in methods used to capture these gases and prevent their release to the atmosphere when it is necessary to remove or repair equipment that includes the gases.
Posted Mon, 01/30/2012 - 05:33