GBA Logo horizontal Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter Instagram YouTube Icon Navigation Search Icon Main Search Icon Video Play Icon Audio Play Icon Headphones Icon Plus Icon Minus Icon Check Icon Print Icon Picture icon Single Arrow Icon Double Arrow Icon Hamburger Icon TV Icon Close Icon Sorted Hamburger/Search Icon
Building Science

Understanding Air Change Rates

There's a lot more to it than just the amount of air flowing into and out of a room

An energy recovery ventilator (ERV) removes stale air from the house and brings in outdoor air

Let’s talk about one of my (and David Byrne’s) favorite subjects: air. Because of the global COVID-19 pandemic and the novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) that spreads it, the indoor air quality (IAQ) community—researchers, mediators, manufacturers, bloggers, groupies—is having a moment. This must be the first time in history that IAQ researchers have logged so many hours on television and been quoted so frequently in news articles. And they’re tweeting up a storm, too. And that brings me to the tweet by IAQ researcher Dustin Poppendieck that served as the impetus for this article:

That tweet was one of four in a short thread he put out earlier this week. His point was that the calculated air change rate is based on how much “new” air you put into a room, but that doesn’t mean you’re removing an equal amount of “old” air from the house. The difference is mixing. Some of the air removed will be the air you just put into the room, with the proportion of new-to-old air dependent on the amount of mixing that happens. And that got me thinking…

What Poppendieck said is important, but he really just scratched the surface of this topic. His tweet referred to a room, but what about larger areas, like a zone or a whole building? What kind of air are we talking about here? Air being recirculated through the heating and cooling system? Air infiltrating and exfiltrating through the building enclosure? Ventilation air? And what do we need to know about mixing?

Mixing it up

Poppendieck’s point is that if you have a room full of air that has a certain concentration of pollutants, you probably don’t remove an equal amount of old just by adding new air. Thus, you don’t remove as many pollutants as you might think. In his tweets, Poppendieck takes a kind of worst-case scenario, one in which you get a lot of mixing, which means less removal of the old-air pollutants. He gives, as an example, the introduction of new air at the rate of 6 air changes per hour (ACH). At that rate, he says, instead of changing all of the air in the room in 1/6 of an hour (10 minutes), it could take “up to 0.5 hours to remove 95%” of the old air. So, mixing means that it could take, in this case, about three times longer to change out most of the air.

But what if you get little to no mixing? You’d get most of the old air removed in about 10 minutes at an air change rate of 6 ACH. How could that happen? By putting the air in slowly and having the entry and exit points well separated in the room. The ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals has a great chapter all about ventilation and infiltration, and they call this type of air movement “displacement flow.” (See diagram below, from chapter 16 of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals.)

At the other end of the mixing spectrum is entrainment flow. The diagram below, also from the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, shows what that looks like.

If you’re in the HVAC industry, the word “entrainment” may be familiar to you. ACCA’s Manual T on air distribution uses that word in discussing the mixing of air in a room. The old air in the room is induced, or entrained, to move with the new (primary) air. The result is that the new and old air get all mixed up in the room. When you have fans or people walking in a room, the air gets even more mixed up.

ACCA Manual T diagram of supply air mixing with secondary air in the room

If your focus is removing pollutants from the room, it’s best to assume the new and old air get at least somewhat mixed up before exiting.

Where’d you get that air?

Although he didn’t mention it, I believe Poppendieck was talking about the new air being ventilation air from outdoors. But air can enter a room in different ways. Many of us live in homes with forced-air heating and cooling systems that recirculate air throughout the home. If you have good filtration integrated with such a system, that can help, too. I’ve written quite a bit about using filters rated at MERV-13 or higher, and they can reduce the pollutants in your indoor air significantly. Fibrous media air filters won’t remove pollutants in the gas phase, but they can capture the particulates, including the droplets and aerosols carrying the coronavirus.

Then there’s the air that infiltrates into the house from outdoors or from buffer spaces, like the garage, crawlspace, and attic. Contrary to what some people still believe, a house does NOT need to breathe. Breathing dead possum from the crawlspace or from air sucked through a dead squirrel in the attic is not as good as straight outdoor air. The best thing to do is air seal the house as much as possible and rely on other ways to improve your indoor air quality.

A disconnected return duct near a dead possum in a crawlspace. Image courtesy of E3 INNOVATE.

Mechanical whole-house ventilation systems help improve indoor air quality by introducing outdoor air into the house. If the coronavirus is the only pollutant you’re concerned with, all outdoor air is good air. But you should be concerned with more than just this one pollutant. In most homes, the majority of the small particulates that are most dangerous to health (PM2.5) comes from outdoors. During wildfires, there’s a whole heck of a lot of particulates in the outdoor air, so good filtration must be part of your IAQ strategy. Also, in some areas, you may need to pay attention to your outdoor air quality on a regular basis and pick the best times to introduce outdoor air.

Room, zone, building

The last issue here is scale. Poppendieck’s tweet focused on a room, which is the right scale for a quarantine room or a room where you might bring other people into your house for a while. But all of the air in your house is connected, and that can help. If, for example, you set up a quarantine or entertainment room with an exhaust fan or exhaust vent for an energy or heat recovery ventilator (ERV or HRV), and your outdoor air is supplied to another part of the house, you’ll come close to having displacement flow. That means you’ll be removing relatively unmixed air that has a lot of the original pollutants in it.

Air flow through a building is a complex subject. If you’re a researcher, diving in and understanding that complexity is important. If you’re a homeowner, teacher, or building supervisor, what’s most important is to look for ways to increase the amount of ventilation in poorly ventilated spaces, clean the air with MERV-13 or higher filters, and block infiltration from garages, crawlspaces, attics, or other places that have worse air than is in the house already. You can also use portable air cleaners, like the Comparetto Cube, to help remove pollutants in a room.

David Byrne and the Talking Heads were ahead of their time, and they had this to say:

Air can hurt you too
Air can hurt you too
Some people say not to worry about the air
Some people never had experience with…
Air…Air

So, pay attention. Some ’a you people just about missed it!

_________________________________________________________________________

-Allison Bailes of Atlanta, Georgia, is a speaker, writer, building science consultant, and founder of Energy Vanguard. He is also the author of the Energy Vanguard Blog. You can follow him on Twitter at @EnergyVanguard.

4 Comments

  1. User avater Expert Member
    Armando Cobo | | #1

    A handful of decades ago in grade school, I set up a chemistry experiment to understand fluid delusion... now my brain is hurting thinking about it! I placed a cup of coffee (Colombian) in a large bowl, and poured additional cups of water until the water was almost clear again. I do remember that many cups of water later, I never got the 100% clear before I ran out of room in that bowl. Since air is a fluid, removing 100% of the old air it would take a long, very long time… Darn it, I should have received a PhD back in grade school. 😁

  2. User avater
    Jon R | | #2

    > a kind of worst-case scenario, one which you get a lot of mixing
    > putting the air in slowly and having the entry and exit points well separated in the room

    The latter could produce a much worse scenario - where there is no mixing and a short-circuit from supply to return. Think Figure 3 with cold supply air and modified to have the return in the lower right. The upper air could (in theory) be undiluted as fresh air short circuits across the floor. Or consider the as-is drawing where very slow supply air is warm and rises straight up the left side wall, skipping most of the room.

    This isn't theoretical - it can happen when large hvac ducts/registers are used for low CFM fresh air or dehumidification flows. The air dribbles out (no throw) and then rises or falls - stratifying to where it may do no good.

    Perhaps best to design for "good throw/mixing under all conditions"?

  3. CarsonB | | #3

    If I follow correctly, the best design is to basically make the house into a wind tunnel with a single return/supply at opposite ends? How would this be applied practically with closed off rooms and the random scattering of supplies/returns needed to supply bedrooms and exhaust bathrooms? Or even within a single room, how is the dashed line in Fig. 3 achieved? Giant wall length registers at the top and bottom of opposing walls?

  4. Expert Member
    Kohta Ueno | | #4

    I'm pretty sure Figure 3 was intended as a hypothetical/teaching example, rather than an example of "this is what you should build in a room or house." Specifically--here's a figure from the ASHRAE Handbook of Applications, Chapter 19, Clean Spaces. The right-hand room shows that type of unidirectional flow, with a full-ceiling grid or diffuser of supply air, creating that uniform, unidirectional flow. In contrast, the left-hand room has normal diffusers, and is *not* unidirectional flow--has more swirl/mixing. Takeaway: probably not worth pursuing unidirectional flow, unless you want to build a clean room.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |