Does Open-Cell Spray Foam Really Rot Roofs?
Researchers from Oak Ridge National Lab have said open-cell spray foam is risky — but what did they miss?
Murmurs and hearsay about open-cell spray foam insulation have been gaining traction for a while. It rots roofs, people have told me. Not long ago, someone even told me that in Florida, roofing companies won't let their workers go up on roofs with open-cell spray foam because the roofs are so spongy, the guys fall right through.
Open-cell spray foam is getting a bad reputation among some people in the construction industry. But is it deserved?
The Energy Nerd stirs up a hornets' nest
Martin Holladay, the Energy Nerd who muses here at Green Building Advisor, stirred up a hornets' nest at the beginning of this year by writing an article titled Open-Cell Spray Foam and Damp Roof Sheathing. In it, he reported on two papers presented at the Conference on Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XII last December. Both papers basically came to the same conclusion: "Open-cell spray foam insulation is risky in all climate zones."
We already know open-cell spray foam, by itself, is risky in cold climates. Moisture from indoors can diffuse through the foam and find the cold roof sheathing, where it accumulates and eventually rots the roof. As a result, in IECC climate zones 5 and higher, building codes require the use of a vapor retarder if you install open-cell spray foam. Many builders in cold climates use closed-cell spray foam instead because of its lower water vapor permeability, which means it doesn't need the extra step of installing a vapor retarder. But open-cell spray foam with a vapor retarder can work, too, and builders in cold climates have had success with it when they do it right.
Open-cell spray foam has become popular in warmer climates, and this is where the two papers that Holladay reported on could cast the most doubt. In fact, the way Holladay reported the remarks of William Miller, the author who presented one of the papers, it sounds like Miller has no doubt: "The roof sheathing is humid when open-cell spray foam is used," is how Holladay quoted him.
The simplified version
The two papers were based on computer simulations. In the first paper, Roof and Attic Design Guidelines for New and Retrofit Construction of Homes in Hot and Cold Climates, the authors used HERS BESTEST and AtticSim. In the second paper, A Hygrothermal Risk Analysis Applied to Residential Unvented Attics, the authors used MATLAB and WUFI.
And that's as far down that path as I'm going. As promised in the title of this section, I'm going to condense this issue, so to speak, down to its essence. If you've read Holladay's article and looked at the 77 comments, you may have ended up hopelessly confused. It's really not that difficult, though. (OK, that’s not 100% true. It can be difficult if you really get into it, but it’s also possible to understand what’s going on without have a physics or engineering degree.) Let's dive in.
Some houses with open-cell spray foam installed on the underside of the OSB roof sheathing have had moisture problems. The OSB got wet and rotted. But where does the moisture come from?
Moisture from above
The authors of the first paper cited a study in South Carolina where the relative humidity in the attic was way too high in summer — 80% to 100%. They didn't know where the moisture was coming from so they speculated that some was coming from above the roof and some from below.
The moisture from above, they thought, comes from rain and dew on the shingles migrating inward and then being forced farther inward during the day by solar vapor drive. It hits the OSB roof sheathing and keeps going through the foam into the attic air. At night it goes back through the foam to the OSB. The next day, even more moisture is driven inward.
There are two problems with this hypothesis. The first was stated eloquently by John Semmelhack in his comment (#9) to Holladay's article: "IF this were the main driving force, wouldn't closed-cell foam be even worse, since the moisture would be driven into the OSB, but stopped (more or less) from drying to the inside?" Yes, it certainly would.
The second problem is that it doesn't fit with what we know now. Joe Lstiburek, principal of Building Science Corporation, previously thought moisture from above could be a problem with spray foam. Then they did a study in Houston showing otherwise. The photo below shows the house where they did the year-long study. As you can see, they used several different roofing underlayment materials, some vapor-impermeable and some vapor-permeable. "Turned out that there was no measurable effect of roofing underlayment permeability on inward moisture drive through the roofing assembly," he wrote in his latest ASHRAEAmerican Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). International organization dedicated to the advancement of heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration through research, standards writing, publishing, and continuing education. Membership is open to anyone in the HVAC&R field; the organization has about 50,000 members. Journal article, Cool Hand Luke Meets Attics.
So, it makes sense that moisture from above wouldn't be the culprit. We have some evidence from the field that that's not it; and if it were the problem, closed-cell spray foam would rot out the OSB even faster.
Moisture from the attic
Another possibility is that the moisture is infiltrating into the attic from outdoors. Ah! That's an easy one. If that's the case, and William Miller proposes that as one possibility, then the spray foam installers didn't do their job.
The biggest benefit of spray foam insulation is its air-sealing quality, so if air is infiltrating into a spray-foamed attic, then the installers missed some spots and need to go back and make it right.
Moisture from the house
Picture this: You take a shower but forget to turn the bath fan on. Or you turn it on but, as is commonly the case, it removes only about half the air it's rated for. The bathroom fills with steam.
Water — surprise, surprise — is lighter than dry air. About 78% of the air is made of nitrogen, N2, with a molecular weight of 28. Another 21% is oxygen, O2, with a molecular weight of 32. When you add in the other 1% of gases, the average molecular weight of a volume of dry air is about 29.
Water, H2O, has a molecular weight of 18. When that steam comes out of the shower, it's going to reduce the average molecular weight of the volume of air containing it to less than 29. Watch the steam. Where does it go? Up! It's more buoyant than the surrounding air, so it rises. (Yeah, yeah, it's pushed up by the more dense air below, just like in the stack effect. But it still rises.) In a normal household where the occupants take a few showers and do some cooking, some of the water vapor may well find its way into the attic.
Moisture generated indoors or that infiltrates into the home, especially from basements and crawl spaces, is responsible for the bulk of the moisture in an attic insulated with spray foam on the underside of the roof sheathing. It's not coming from above the roof and it's not some new moisture source resulting from the spray foam.
Lstiburek takes blame for bad language
So what do you do to make sure your roof insulated with open-cell spray foam won't rot? You deal with the air in the attic; that's what. If you haven't read it yet, I recommend Lstiburek's latest article, Cool Hand Luke Meets Attics. He opens:
In what is turning out to be an unfortunate turn of phrase, the terms “unvented attics” and “unvented roofs” have entered the lexicon. A lot of the blame for that goes to me, and for that I am sorry. The “right” terms should have been “conditioned attics” and “conditioned roofs.”
He then explains in the article some of the problems I've described above but also gives the solution. The easiest solution, he says, is "just add a supply and return to the attic space and be done with it."
The problem with that solution, though, is that it violates the building code for an attic with exposed spray foam insulation. It's OK to leave the foam exposed in an attic if you cover it with an ignition barrier. If you directly condition the attic, however, now you need a thermal barrier, and no builder's gonna do that.
Lstiburek is working to fix the codes, but unfortunately, it won't happen till the 2018 cycle at the earliest. He gives a couple of other suggestions, though, to help you work with the current messy situation, and I'll refer you to his article for those. One of the solutions is to do what they do in commercial buildings and use smoke detectors in the ducts so the system gets shut down during a fire. See his article for more details and specific references from the mechanical code.
The conclusion to draw from all this is that it's best to be skeptical of modeling studies not backed up by field studies, especially when they seem to contradict experience. Yes, some homes with open-cell spray foam have had moisture problems. Many more have performed perfectly well.
Open-cell spray foam is not the enemy. It has its strengths and weaknesses, just as any building material. You don't have to be worried about using it. You just need to know how to do it right.
- Don't use open-cell spray foam in cold climates (IECC climate zones 5 and higher) unless you also install a vapor retarder over it.
- Make sure the installers get the attic sealed airtight. Test with a blower door to commission it.
- Monitor the attic's relative humidity and temperature. Low-cost thermo-hygrometers with remote sensors are widely available. You could also put an alarm on it.
- Condition the air in the attic. Lstiburek says to do it for every spray-foam attic. Others, like HVAC(Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning). Collectively, the mechanical systems that heat, ventilate, and cool a building. designer David Butler, say you need to do it only if a moisture problem develops.
There you have it. Open-cell spray foam is a perfectly acceptable insulation product to use in attics. Do it right, and your roof should not rot.
- Energy Vanguard
- Building Science Corporation
Apr 23, 2014 5:31 AM ET
Apr 23, 2014 8:57 AM ET
Apr 23, 2014 10:33 AM ET
Apr 23, 2014 3:10 PM ET
Apr 23, 2014 3:20 PM ET
Apr 24, 2014 2:35 PM ET
Apr 24, 2014 2:45 PM ET
Apr 25, 2014 6:42 PM ET
Apr 26, 2014 8:14 PM ET
Apr 28, 2014 9:50 AM ET
Apr 28, 2014 10:15 AM ET
Apr 29, 2014 6:51 AM ET
Apr 29, 2014 7:11 AM ET
Apr 29, 2014 10:55 AM ET
Apr 29, 2014 11:47 AM ET
Apr 30, 2014 6:33 PM ET