building-scienceheader image

Thermal Bridging

Why insulation should not end with filling framing cavities

Posted on Mar 19 by Peter Yost

Everything is relative — especially when it comes to thermal bridgingHeat flow that occurs across more conductive components in an otherwise well-insulated material, resulting in disproportionately significant heat loss. For example, steel studs in an insulated wall dramatically reduce the overall energy performance of the wall, because of thermal bridging through the steel. . Thermal bridging occurs wherever assembly components with low R-values relative to surrounding materials span from the inside to the outside of a building assembly. Thermal bridging takes place in wood-framed assemblies because, although wood is a pretty good insulator at about R-1 per inch, it is at least three times more thermally conductive than any cavity insulation, which start at about R-3.5 per inch.


With steel framing at about R.04 per inch, it’s thermal bridging on a whole different scale. Steel framing typically reduces the in-cavity R-value by as much as 50%, while wood framing reduces in-cavity R-value by a bit less than 10%.

Wrapping a building envelopeExterior components of a house that provide protection from colder (and warmer) outdoor temperatures and precipitation; includes the house foundation, framed exterior walls, roof or ceiling, and insulation, and air sealing materials. with exterior rigid insulation cuts off the thermal bridging. Rigid insulation as exterior sheathingMaterial, usually plywood or oriented strand board (OSB), but sometimes wooden boards, installed on the exterior of wall studs, rafters, or roof trusses; siding or roofing installed on the sheathing—sometimes over strapping to create a rainscreen. is a great idea for wood-framed assemblies, imperative for steel. But as in all things hygrothermalA term used to characterize the temperature (thermal) and moisture (hygro) conditions particularly with respect to climate, both indoors and out., you get a double benefit when you reduce or eliminate thermal bridging — you save energy and reduce the potential for condensation, mold, and rot.

The main reason we put insulation in framing cavities is because there is space — it’s the easiest and least expensive place to put the stuff. But it is not the best place, in large part because of thermal bridging. In what Joe Lstiburek of Building Science Corporation calls the "perfect wall” (or roof), all of the insulation is on the exterior. This means that the building frame experiences nearly the same conditions as the occupants, a real recipe for happy, comfortable, and long-lived people and buildings.

To gauge the energy implications of framing type, spacing, and thermal bridging, try the ORNL Whole Wall R-value Calculator.


Tags: , , ,

Image Credits:

  1. Dan Morrison
Mar 20, 2009
8:20 PM EDT

Prevent Thermal Bridging While Maintaining 6-9/16" Jambs
by Kevin Klein

March 18th, 2009

Being “Green” first and foremost starts with being energy efficient. There is no better way to insure that your building envelope conserves energy then to use closed cell spray foam insulation. With the highest R-Value rating at or around 6.8 per inch and achieving a vapor barrier at or around 2″ thickness, closed cell foam is simply the best performing insulation on the market and should be an integral part of your wall and attic designs. One wall design that is sure to become more popular utilizes 2×4 studs, 2″ foam board as a thermal break, 7/16 OSB or other structural sheeting using 3.5″ screws for fasteners. Then the 2×4 stud cavities are sprayed with 2″ of closed cell foam. The total wall thickness ends up to be 6-9/16″, standard for window and door jambs. The R-Value of this quiet and comfortable energy wall is 24! There are many other ways to utilize closed cell foam for your insulation that will not break your budget and will pay dividends in energy savings for the life of your home. We will discuss some more of them in the days to come.
Thefoamman
www.thefoamman.net

May 19, 2009
9:37 AM EDT

Is an R-24 wall noteworthy?
by jim blodgett

"The R-Value of this quiet and comfortable energy wall is 24!"

I'm no building scientist, Kevin, but if we agree that heat radiates, I don't see why we applaud an R-24 wall when building codes (read "minimum acceptable standards") call for R-30 and better in roofs and floors.

Shouldn't we be trying to create a balanced envelope?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Discussion policy: The editorial staff at GreenBuildingAdvisor.com does review user submissions. Please be respectful of others. Inappropriate content will be removed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

* required fields